"Muggles" wrote in message ...
On 2/5/2021 12:40 PM, Bod wrote:
On 05/02/2021 18:38, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort. They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didn’t stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didn’t get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again. These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test. Its not like they got a
free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.

Correct "and NO safety concerns have been raised"

HAHAHA! Thousands of people have safety concerns!

Only the fools like you.

That quote means that no safety issues were OBSERVED.