View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
T[_6_] T[_6_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,459
Default More proof masks are ineffective

On 2020-10-17 22:20, Fred wrote:


"T" wrote in message ...
On 2020-10-17 18:59, John Kuthe wrote:
On Friday, October 16, 2020 at 9:02:25 AM UTC-5, masktard wrote:

Cloth masks help keep us from spraying moisture droplets out our
mouth and nose. An N95 mask helps prevent the spread of viruses like
influenzas like Covid 19 or Tuberculosis VIRUSES to/from ourselves.

John Kuthe, RN, BSN...


Bull ****.


Fact actually.

Prove it with a randomized clinical trial.


https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577


Hi Fred,

Thank you for actually doing it right. "Science
baby science", to quote Simon Pegg:

Results The rates of all infection outcomes were
highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI
statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask
arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07)
compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also
had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with
the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed
ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-
confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were
significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared
with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth
masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks
44%.

The key words a
Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost
97% and medical masks 44%.

The study shows clearly that neither one works. And
that the cloth ones are atrocious.

And at 44% or 97%, "you first!". 44% is way more that
is necessary to get infected. 97% is total bull ****.

I have a study that shows cloth masks cluster bombing
folks and aerosols going right through N95 masks. Would
you like to see either one or both?

By the way, I work for a guy that designed the N95.
He told me in no unequivocal terms that THEY ARE
NOT DESIGNED FOR VIRUSES.

-T