On 07/08/2020 00:00, T i m wrote:
On 6 Aug 2020 21:49:13 GMT, Bob Eager wrote:

snip


Yes, but Jim is one of those sad old radio amateurs who lives in the past.

And there is no logic to his statement.

If he's happy with 'cycles per second' because it means what it says,
how uncomfortable must he be with pretty well ever other unit that
doesn't (or not with any level of accuracy)?

No wonder it's driven him crazy! ;-)

Cheers, T i m

as you say timmy