On Thursday, 23 July 2020 10:57:12 UTC+1, alan_m wrote:
On 23/07/2020 03:01, tabbypurr wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 22:10:15 UTC+1, alan_m wrote:
On 22/07/2020 21:55, tabbypurr wrote:

You think a factor of 25x difference in survival is minimal? Methinks you've not read the relevant bits of paper.

Wow 25x!

I'm now convinced

you've looked at the studies? Why are you convinced?

I obviously have been reading the wrong articles where the speculation
from the studies is at best statistically insignificant or the
conclusions from the studies or research are contradicted a few weeks
later by others.

As always one has to assess each study, since so much is in reality junk science.

From this I came to the conclusion that possibly any dietary or medical
drugs that I could take were likely to only have a negligible effect
with regards the Covid 19 virus.

You have enlightened me by claiming a 25 times better chance of not
catching the virus, or perhaps more accurately, if caught a 25 times
better chance of surviving without complications.


and seeing as you have already done the research which
recommendations are you making, and presumably following?

I thought I said what I'm following.

I seemed to have missed all of your postings where you have highlighted
these impressive improvements to prevent detrimental change of life
outcomes.

Please just list what you are taking as a result of your research.

I see vitamin D supplements and possibly multi-vitamins but surely these
would only have a negligible effect on any covid 19 outcome. From where
do the real 25x improvements come from?

With respect if you've been following the subject you'll know where the 25x mortality rate difference came from. Are you saying you don't?


NT