On 7/3/2020 9:33 AM, J. Clarke wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:23:59 -0500, dpb wrote:

On 7/2/2020 10:02 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
...

A typical "shed" is not subject to code in most localities you know.

I'd wager that isn't necessarily so, but the point isn't/wasn't whether
the particular is or isn't subject to Code.

It's at least reasonable to check on what UBC says is minimum just for
knowing whether one decides to follow or not.

Does sound somewhat skimpy depending upon just what it actually does
consist of in the upper "loft".

Personally I'm an engineer--I'm happy to do my own stress analysis.
....

So'm I...but he's done gone and one what has done and certainly posting
link to the UBC tables isn't recommending doing something.

The one recommendation I did give would be stronger that what he started
with whether it's up to Code or not it wouldn't be worse than existing.

--