"Richard" wrote in message
...
On 26/05/2020 20:55, Tim Streater wrote:
On 26 May 2020 at 18:33:22 BST, "Jake56" wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
polygonum_on_google wrote:
Anyone can make a mistake. (Even me!) Admitting, accepting,
apologising.
They are what draw the poison.

And those in a similar sort of position who've done so have all
resigned.

No one else did it when both were infected with the virus
and had kids who had to be looked after by someone with
the only suitable relos that far away.

Personally I don't think any of them should have resigned. Of the regs
controlling all this, the social distancing and the general stay-at-home
rule
are the only important ones. For the rest, there should have just been a
general exception for buying food, and urgent situations. What is an
urgent
situation? You decide. After that, all you need is spot checks by the
fuzz.
Trying to micromanage what is or is not an urgent situation is a fool's
errand.

They *should* resign. These are the ****bags who created the fuzziness and
seem to have done so purely so they can continue doing as they please.
Double standards is what it's all about. For a pathetic **** like Cummings
to cite obscure text within his cunningly drafted rules proves these
*******s to be worthless scum.

Or he realised that it would make sense for some in
that situation to do that and he was right about that.

And I *did* vote for the conservatives last time.

And will do next time, you watch.

With any luck, SD will last beyond the end of this, and fewer people will
be
infected with other things like flu. Then folk might start to understand
that
this country is OVERCROWDED and that something needs to be done about it.