On 05/03/2020 17:52:51, Robin wrote:
On 05/03/2020 17:26, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:16:38 +0000, Robin wrote:
On 05/03/2020 16:02, Jethro_uk wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:31:06 +0000, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:21:37 -0800 (PST), fred wrote:
[quoted text muted]
The dye maybe, but there are other tracers or at least that is what we
are lead to believe.Â* B-)
Tiniest traces of radioactive marker ?
no
"Developed by the chemical company Dow, a chemical €”
((3-(sec-butyl)-4-(decyloxy)phenyl)methanetriyl) tribenzene €” is added
to the diesel as a marker. Once it has been added to the fuel, it is
difficult to remove €” giving HMRC a better chance of identifying any
fraud. The marker is easily detected using gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry €” but laboratory testing means delays in combatting the
fraud."
Â*From https://tinyurl.com/tdta292 or
https://www.chromatographytoday.com/...detected/37727
Ta, I didn't realise they'd both changed and gone public.
I would have thought the authorities would have little choice but
provide details of the marker.
Otherwise what evidence are they going to produce to gain a conviction
for unsolicited use?