On 17/01/2020 18:34:40, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Fredxx wrote:
On 17/01/2020 14:25:25, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
It is not that it is more efficient per se,just massively more cost
effectibve. off peak nuclear electricity is almost giveaway

Just like surplus wind power, then?

But I'm sure a good right winger like you would soon find a way of
charging plenty for it. Capitalism can't survive without profit.

You're right.
A right winger will ensure the customer pays.

Not really, just make sure someone pays. Preferably not themselves.

A left winger will ensure everyone else pays, usually a tax payer.

I take it then you hate any form of insurance? Where the load is spread
more evenly?

I don't want to pay for anyone else's insurance that I will never make
use of.

Socialism can't exist without money trees.
That must make Boris a socialist.

It must.

North Korea perhaps being an
obvious state discovering there is no free money tree.

You'd compare N Korea to the UK?

Is it really so difficult to accept there are advantages to a mixed
economic?

I've always accepted and believed in one. Best of both worlds. But lots on
here despise it. Everything only exists to make a profit from.

Then stop deriding capitalism.