View Single Post
  #131   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher[_2_] The Natural Philosopher[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default Hydrogen engines

On 19/01/2020 20:17, Pancho wrote:
On 19/01/2020 14:42, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:37:34 +0000, Chris Hogg wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:17:14 +0000, Pancho
wrote:

On 19/01/2020 12:53, Chris Hogg wrote:

Lots of 'potential' storage solutions, such as compressed air into
underground caverns, trundling very heavy weights on rail tracks up
mountains, Tesla-type batteries everywhere and so on. But none of it
comes near to pumped storage in terms of capacity, and that's very
dependent on the right topography, most of which has already been
used. Those other solutions may be OK for very short term
peak-lopping, but none are capable of storing the amounts of energy
needed to run the country for a several days at this time of year,

OK, I was seeing quotes of hydrogen storage providing* months energy
supply as opposed to a few hours for pumped storage. The main
difference
being hydrogen is 40% efficient where as pumped is 80% efficient.


But how and where are they going to store a month's worth of hydrogen?
The volume would be absolutely huge, even if compressed. The phrase
'greens don't do sums' is occasionally trotted out on this NG. That
looks like a classic example of just that.


AND:

Where is the capacity coming from? Unreliables, supported by nuclear?
Bear in mind that whatever unreliable is being used as the primary
generator, when the 'battery' (in whatever form that might be) gets
substantially discharged, not only will the primary generators have to
supply the ongoing day-to-day demand, they will also have to recharge
that 'battery' PDQ, in anticipation of another generation-free period
in a week or so's time. How much extra generating capacity that might
need, I don't know, but substantial, I would think.
* That problem doesn't arise with nuclear.

A large battery gives plenty of time for a battery to recharge, two
months is a big battery.

Actually the problem does occur with nuclear, too. You need rapid
dispatch to counter the variability of demand.


Nuclear is as capable of rapid dispatch as coal was and coal ran the
entire grid once.

You can store a lot of energy in a big steam boiler

And in the UK we have enough hydro to cover the intermediate dispatch
requirements.



--
But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an
hypothesis!

Mary Wollstonecraft