Thread: Voted
View Single Post
  #73   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Richard[_10_] Richard[_10_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,625
Default Voted

On 01/12/2019 06:55, RJH wrote:
On 30/11/2019 11:34, tim... wrote:


"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Friday, 29 November 2019 15:13:10 UTC, Andy BurnsĀ* wrote:
T i m wrote:

I doubt I'll be actually spoiling either this time as I / we have
something we actually / specifically want to protest against

Why not do what everyone else will be doing and decide to vote for[1]
someone, rather than against something?

I'd say because in the general election, although Brexit is perhaps
the biggest thing there are other things to be condidered from the
NHS to what to do about climate change (if it's happening)


and wtf difference is voting for one party or the other going to do
anyway?

we are 0.1% of the world population


And consume/produce vastly more per capita than most countries. And
we're (the UK) about 1% of the global population - producing 1% of CO2
emissions (for example, insofar as that's a measure of it all).

we can reduce our carbon footprint to zero and it's going to make ****
all difference if the other 99.9% does nothing (which is exactly what
most of them are doing)


Why would that stop you doing the right thing?


The right thing is sustainable population. That doesn't mean enough food
to feed the pestilence, it means a population that does not adversely
affect the balance.

The right thing to do is cull several billion, but that is deemed
extreme. Natural calamities will just have to do, or a new top level
predator might be cool.