On 10/09/2019 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Fredxx wrote:
You think the label will say 'The only way this product is suitable for
human consumption was by the addition of chlorine'?

It will probably say "enhanced cleanliness" or something similar. Do you
drink water made "suitable for human consumption was by the addition of
chlorine"?

Good to know you can't see the difference between something which is
necessary and something which isn't.

If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why isn't it
used in the UK?

They don't add chlorine to the chicken. There is a quick rinse is a very
dilute bath, followed by a rinse in fresh water.



I'm sure you'll be perfectly happy eating contaminated food which is only
made safe by adding chemicals. To save a few pennies. Especially since
chicken in the UK is already the cheapest meat you can buy.

It's what you Brexiteers are all about, isn't it? Being able to buy the
very cheapest product from anywhere and sod our local producers.



You clearly aren't familiar with what happen to the English
fishing industry, or you are and are ignoring it.