On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:36:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 23:25:38 UTC+1, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:46:55 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 11:04:25 UTC+1, T i m wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:59:30 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr wrote:
On Monday, 26 August 2019 13:25:36 UTC+1, Roger Hayter wrote:

I think anything that can run apcupsd can be networked easily to the box
controlling the UPS. Remakably painless. It's only worth using NUT
(which can allegedly follow an apcupsd server) if there's something like
a NAS you can't install apcupsd on. NUT is less painless.

sounds like a pain in the ....

So how would you do it, assuming you understood why it might be a
'good idea' to have say 3 machines (but only) on one UPS?

I take it you completely missed the moment of mild humour.

Ah, sorry. I got my 5 year old nephew to read your insightful and
humorous reply and he explained why it was 'funny'. ;-)

I didn't realise you were American ... ?


you're making no sense.

How ironic. ;-)

Cheers, T i m