On Thursday, 24 January 2019 08:11:27 UTC, RJH wrote:
On 23/01/2019 12:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

The point is that the mainstream media are the worst places to get facts
from.


If you use a range, across politics and location, you'll generally end
up in the right ballpark.

Sometimes. Sometimes not at all.

What I don't understand is where you/yours get the information that in
turn informs your opinion. It's clearly not books or science - inherent
bias, you seem to insist. It seems to be a combination of hard code,
anecdote and following a pack.

Translation: you don't agree with it.


NT