On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:46:02 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
wrote:
facts ran the pooboi off once again, even though he
posted to others after this posting.
I'm looking for content not sound bites. That takes time which frankly
is wasted bothering to post my results here. I have already delved far
deeper than the usual suspects here who offer their worthless opinion or
require someone else to carry the water and ask stupid questions they
could research themselves. You know who you are T. T then incredibly
calls the validity of the research into question after asking who funded
it and clearly failed to even look himself.
So far I've been told I should worry far more about socialism and its
propensity to kill and been met with the usual nonsense from our
resident 'scientist'.
Such is the wealth and breath of talent in the naysayers mob.
It's like casting pearls before swine.
LOL
"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
: On 23/10/2018 19:19, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote:
: On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:32:14 +0100, Norman Wells
: wrote:
:
: On 23/10/2018 12:29, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote:
: On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:11:32 +0100, Norman Wells
: wrote:
:
: On 23/10/2018 12:02, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote:
: On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:49:28 +0100, Norman Wells
: wrote:
:
: The point about science is that it establishes the truth. It may
be
: 'bleeding obvious' to you that eating organic will prevent you
being
: sick or prematurely dead, but science, sadly, does not support
you in
: that belief.
:
: Yeah, bet you said that about smoking, lead in petrol, paint ..
the list
: is endless.
:
: The people who said that, many years ago incidentally, all had a
vested
: interest. As regards organic food, there are masses of independent
: scientific studies by those with no axe to grind, none of which
show any
: significant advantage tastewise or healthwise of organic produce
over
: the equivalent conventional goods.
:
: Show me one that studied 70,000 volunteers.
:
: The numbers are irrelevant if the study does not include a control
: group. It's unscientific, probably self-selecting, and no valid
: conclusions can be drawn from it. Too many other factors are in play
: that have not been eliminated.
:
: You need to learn a bit about scientific method.
:
: You presented no proof of the methods used in this study. You made all
: that up.
:
: There's plenty enough to be going on with in the Reuters report:
:
:
https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-he...-idUKKCN1MW23D
:
: If you want the full article:
:
:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2707948
:
: You should read the limitations set out in both, because effectivley
: they consign the study to the dustbin.
:
: You haven't studied this at all Norman because you missed the real
: biggie that there was correlation between this study and other studies
: and incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and pesticide use. Wow wee! Yes
: Norman, did you deliberately miss this because it's obviously very
: interesting in light of the recent case about Monsanto's Roundup and
: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Why did you miss this Norman? Stay sharp Norman
: because there are cats about. Your lack of attention to detail will be
: exposed.
:
: Anyway, considering this huge omission we can safely conclude that your
: critique is worthless.
:
: No because if you follow the link to the actual study at:
:
: https://www.nature.com/articles/bjc2014148
:
: you'll find:
:
: "Conclusions:
: In this large prospective study there was little or no decrease in the
: incidence of cancer associated with consumption of organic food, except
: possibly for non-Hodgkin lymphoma."
:
: So, no proof of any reduced cancer risk at all, certainly not 25% as in
: the thread heading, and only an unproven 'possibility' as regards
: non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
:
: It's not very impressive, is it?
Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, ******* hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infme,
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook,
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag,
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
punk ass dole whore troll, no nothing innumerate religious maniac,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.
NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist
Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.
Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky