On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 16:43:46 +0100, Huge wrote:

On 2018-04-29, Bob F wrote:
On 4/29/2018 7:58 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:38:56 +0100, Bob F wrote:

On 4/29/2018 7:22 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 14:43:18 +0100, dpb wrote:

On 4/29/2018 8:36 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
...

So it wasn't really necessary to have it there.

Insurance is only necessary after the fire, too...

Insurance is a con. Remember, insurance companies make a profit....


Only if you can afford to rebuild your house after the fire without
insurance.

But it's not likely to happen. Look at the odds. What percentage of
the value of your house do you pay to the insurance company? Now on
average they make a profit, so the chances of actually needing a full
payout must be virtually nothing.


Do you actually OWN a home? Do you have the money to replace it? If it
burns down, will you ever be able to own one again?

Why are you arguing with a troll?

Why don't you use your killfile?

--
If a cow laughs, does milk come out of its nose?