On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 9:14:44 PM UTC-5, wrote:
"Not sure if a more expensive one would do better or not
for this. "

I think it is a limitation of the design. Digital scopes simply are not the same.

That's crap. I can make my digital scope do anything an analog or storage scope can do, and much more, better, faster, and save the waveforms indefinitely. I can make it act exactly like an analog scope if I want, with much higher resolution, bandwidth, and I'm not limited to seeing one width of the screen. In every way including triggering, the digital scope is more sophisticated and capable. I frankly can't imagine a reason to go back and use an analog scope.