In message , at 11:32:18 on Mon, 12
Feb 2018, pamela remarked:
"The majority voted for a Unicorn, so we have to find one".

But they didn't vote for a unicorn. They voted for no SM, no CU,
no ECJ, no more EU laws, no dosh to Brussels. It's really very
simple.

So the Unicorn seekers like David Davis (who wants all the
benefits to continue, and none of the obligations) are in fact
misinterpreting their brief?

Why blame David Davis when it's Theresa May calling the shots?

She clearly doesn't have her heart in the way Brexit is heading but
is doing her best, which may noy be enough, to hold it together.

May was a borderline Remainer before the referendum and, although she
kept quiet, she probably does believe Brexit is a Unicorn hunt.

The current stance of "no customs union" is pretty 'hard Brexit'. Only
time will tell whether that sends Eire off the deep end for a second
time.

Where DD is making himself look foolish is his insistence that the
government's position is clear "we want our cake and eat it", when
responding to calls from Barnier to "make the position clear, because
you can't have your cake and eat it".
--
Roland Perry