On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:05:54 +0700, John B.
wrote:

On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:10:53 -0800, Ted Bell
wrote:

On 1/28/2018 6:53 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 23:21:07 +0000 (UTC), Ed ****dress
wrote:


Blame the Spaniards. We just killed Mexicans for it. But it isn't
clear whether we really wanted it, either. It was just in the way.


As the rat ******* how many Mexicans the Spanish killed.

(VBG)

30 million? 50 million?

A few thousand. There weren't two million Native Americans in north and
south America combined when the Spanish arrived.

You're making **** up again - just like the "cull" and the "list".

Maybe they culled the Mexicans ;-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popula...the_Am ericas


Using an estimate of approximately 37 million people in Mexico,
Central and South America in 1492 (including 6 million in the Aztec
Empire, 5-10 million in the Mayan States, 11 million in what is now
Brazil, and 12 million in the Inca Empire), the lowest estimates give
a death toll due from disease of 90% by the end of the 17th century
(nine million people in 1650).[5] Latin America would match its
15th-century population early in the 19th century; it numbered 17
million in 1800, 30 million in 1850, 61 million in 1900, 105 million
in 1930, 218 million in 1960, 361 million in 1980, and 563 million in
2005.[5] In the last three decades of the 16th century, the population
of present-day Mexico dropped to about one million people.[5] The Maya
population is today estimated at six million, which is about the same
as at the end of the 15th century, according to some estimates.[5] In
what is now Brazil, the indigenous population declined from a
pre-Columbian high of an estimated four million to some 300,000.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus