OT Can a country with 18 nukes win a nuclear war against a country with 1800 nukes
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:21:58 -0500, Clare Snyder
wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:51:05 -0600, Ignoramus1521
wrote:
Let's say that country A has 1,800 nuclear weapons.
And let's say that country B has 18 nuclear weapons that can reach
country A with 1 square mile accuracy.
And further let's suppose that these two countries are in a nuclear conflict.
Is it possible that country B could "win a nuclear war" and force
country A to end the war on highly unfavorable terms, despite having
only 1% of A's nuclear arsenal?
The real answer is that it is entirely possible, if country B's
arsenal is survivable (hard to find and well defended) and country B
can take more pain than country A.
What this brings up is a realization that nuclear war is in some ways
similar to a negotiation, rather than straight war like most
conventional war. The reason for this is a unique ability of nuclear
weapons to deliver a lot of pain over a long distance. Thus, nuclear
weapons can hurt countries directly, as opposed to conventional
weapons, which have to first work against their militaries.
i
To be totally truthfull - NOBODY can win a nuke war in today's
climate - EVERYONE loses as soon as the next nuke is deployed in
anger.
Bingo.
--
Silence is more musical than any song.
-- Christina Rossetti
|