On 10/10/17 18:12, Nightjar wrote:
On 10-Oct-17 10:42 AM, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 09-Oct-17 10:32 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Nightjar
wrote:
...
My question was what practical difference would it make if the result
were legally binding? No UK government has ever failed to abide by
the result of a referendum.

Then why are certain people bleating about it "only being advisory" as
if that were relevant in some way?

Perhaps so that, if Brexit turns out to be the disaster that those of us
who voted to remain anticipate, people will be reminded that the
government had a choice :-)


No its all part ogf a contuning effeoirt by te EU and Left rolling
propagandsa machie to scare peopl into not leaving after all.

HOWEVER unelss the EU break their own rules, which is as comnmon as ****
when all is siad and done we couldnt re-enter and we have committed to
leaving.

Of course they would love us to come crawling back, accept European
central bank rules, pay even more, adopt the Euro, and go down with Her
Royal Majesty Queen Merkel in buck pal.


The EU wanst us far more than we want them, as long as we don't play any
part whatsoever in its direction or ogranisation.


--
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the
gospel of envy.

Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill