On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 4:23:12 PM UTC-4, Seaview wrote:
On 8/7/2017 2:10 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 2:42:51 PM UTC-4, Seaview wrote:
On 8/7/2017 12:06 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
multiple-state voters appear to be a small fraction of one percent of
all voters.


http://www.lovethispic.com/blog/1273...ed-for-hillary

So, just how extensive was the voter fraud? According to a voting fraud
investigation agency, VoterFraud.org, an astounding 3 million votes were
cast by non-citizens. The bombshell revelation was made after the group
completed an analysis of a database containing 180 million voter
registrations.



€œNumber of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million. Consulting legal team,€�
tweeted Gregg Phillips, who heads up the fraud reporting agency.


Its safe to assume that virtually all of the votes cast by these 3
million illegals wouldve been for Hillary Clinton, meaning that Trump
wouldve won in a landslide against Hillary in the popular vote as well.
States where this fraud went on wouldve been in locations allowing
people to vote with no identification, including California, Illinois,
Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C.

By your own standards, this is not believable until it reported by a journalist of the caliber of Bob Woodward. So far, it has not.



This is also not an example of "fact-checking", so your comment is a non
sequitur.

I see. It's a fact that there were all these illegal votes because you read someone's tweet on someone else's blog. And THAT you blindly accept as "truth?" Why don't you look a little deeper and find out whether there is actual evidence of voter fraud other than "someone (or everyone) says so, so it must be true?"