On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:13:46 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article , Archibald
Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns
wrote:

Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:

Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea

I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ...

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/0...rom-remainers-
over-chlorinated-chicken

That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact.
Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine.

Nice shimmy, Mr Biscuit-Barrel: you have no argument so you shift the
goal posts.

I think you miss the point. Chlorine kills bacteria and removes
smells. Like wearing hard hats or dust masks, it is far better to
remove the problem at source instead of taking precautions. If chicken
is produced in a clean hygenic environment, chlorine is an
irrellevence and can only reduce the flavour and quality of the
finished product. In other words it's either old stock or produced in
a filthy slaughterhouse.

AB