On 23/07/17 15:57, Bert Coules wrote:
Mark Allread wrote:

I think he is just out to cause a nuisance.

That's possible, but it doesn't diminish the fact that his causing a
nuisance could be, well, a nuisance.

He's claiming that the incursion over the boundary has affected both the
value and the ease of reselling of his property.



He *might* be right if a potential buyer noticed it and questioned.

Flying freeholds (where they exist) cause no end of trouble.