On 6/22/2017 1:05 PM, Sonny wrote:
On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:20:03 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:

A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.


Leon's comment worded differently:

"In a statement to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Yevgeniy (Eugene) Turin of McGuire Law claimed the suit is based on the fact that "reasonable consumers" are unaware of the difference between nominal (pre-surfacing of the four sides) and actual dimensions."

;~) A "Reasonable" person is lawyer speak. I learned long ago that
reasonable was used in place of "the way most "might" think".

The problem is that reasonable does not equal what is right or correct.

In this case, if all reasonable persons were educated to industry
standards they would not be upset about the measuring description that
has been used for many years. But reasonable or not the complainants
are not educated in this field.

Just wait until one of those entitled millennial's buys a "Skil" Saw and
is upset because it saw does not make the operator a skillful one.







The key point in the above statement, and what the suit is based on, is "reasonable customers". It should be easy to prove those customers are definitely "not reasonable", hence the suit should be easily dismissed.

One has to think unreasonably (be unreasonable), in order to dream-up an asinine case, as this.

For those customers, HD & Menards should mandate (counter suit!) that they can only buy rough cut lumber.... and be further charged with filing frivolous law suits.

Sonny