trader_4 news:eef874c5-a266-4454-b9ae-
Fri, 12 May 2017 15:04:14 GMT in
alt.home.repair, wrote:

On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 6:33:12 AM UTC-4, Diesel wrote:
trader_4
Fri, 12
May 2017 00:04:54 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote:

Yes I wrote that. This is an attack how exactly?


It implies that I don't know WTF I'm talking about.

How does it imply any such thing?

Still waiting.

Are you still unable to use a search engine?

No, but you're obviously unable to understand that the one
making the claim is the one that's responsible for providing
the proof.

I agree with you. So...

MID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149462596500
I'm betting that any difference in radiated heat because
of paint color are inconsequential.

Your proof of that claim is where? I didn't write anything about
paint color, you just made that assumption. You might even try to
disagree that the source(s) I have aren't talking about paint as you
define paint, so, again, I'm asking you, specifically, what you
consider to be a credible source and/or sources. Before, I post them.

You claim you're new to the newsgroup, want to participate. Well,
Ive been here a long time and can tell you that your approach is
not one that's welcome or gets you any respect.

It's no claim. I am new here. Although, I didn't say I was here to
participate. That's just an assumption you're making at this point.
Despite the fact I have taken interest in some threads, it's not my
primary reason for being here.

I'd have to take what you say as far as my approach with a large salt
shaker. I've noticed various individuals here continue referring to
you as a troll and have filtered you as a result. I'm not looking for
a welcome party, or respect from anyone posting here. As I wrote
above, participation is NOT my primary reason for being here.

You're having problems here not only with me,
but with Philo and now Uncle.

Going by your understanding, I might have an issue with a total of
three of you, then. That's still a small number. I use the word might
because I have no real issues with Uncle, and, afaik, the issues
Philo and I had were the result of being mislead by his 'friend'
concerning our mutual skillsets and knowledge.

Plus you've apparently dragged
an existing following in here of others too.

Nope. They've been here for a bit longer than myself actually. You
have it almost reversed, except that I wasn't 'dragged' here, I came
of my own free will.

Should I be using crayons, or, have you figured out why i'm here now?


What would be considered credible references to you, specifically?

Just put up what you have so everyone can see it and evaluate it.

I asked you, specifically you, a very simple question.

The fact that you can't, speaks for itself. No point in discussing
what's credible, what's not when you have ZILCH.

You know what they say about assumptions, right?

Until you do, I'm done with you, no point in screwing around
with a troll.

You use the word troll incorrectly to describe me. I'm not one. But,
I do find your comment hillarious on the face of it. If it helps.


--
I would like to apologize for not having offended you yet.
Please be patient. I will get to you shortly.