Thread
:
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
View Single Post
#
3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
Foxs Mercantile
external usenet poster
Posts: 164
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On 2/2/2017 2:53 PM,
wrote:
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
It seems that some people advocate that.
Most "old" radios are from 1930-1960.
That makes them 87-57 years old.
Manufacturing has changed a lot.
I change all the caps simply because I don't waste my time
"troubleshooting" bad caps.
Bad caps can cause collateral damage.
Why risk it for the cost (low) of replacement parts?
Old electrolytic filter caps dry out.
It's a fools game to waste time trying to reform them.
Paper dielectric capacitor absorb moisture and that
combines with the acids in the paper and cause them to fail.
For the most part, mica, silver dipped mica and ceramic
capacitors are very reliable. The band ones, you can find
AFTER you've replaced the usual suspects and can actually
trouble shoot the radio rather than running around in circles
chasing known bad parts.
Yes, I've had to replace the occasional vacuum tube, or found
an open coil, but for the most part 99% of the radios I've
worked on, worked to a fashion by just replacing known bad
parts. I.e. Paper and electrolytic capacitors.
--
Jeff-1.0
wa6fwi
http://www.foxsmercantile.com
Reply With Quote
Foxs Mercantile
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Foxs Mercantile