Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
It seems that some people advocate that. I understand that the electrolytic caps contain chemicals which decay over time, from the chemicals corroding the metal parts. So, electrolytic caps should always be replaced. But why replace the old paper caps coated with wax? All they are, is metal foil and paper rolled up, and as long as the wax is sealing them to keep out moisture, why should they become defective? And for that matter, what are the new ones made from? Aside from being sealed inside of some sort of plastic (instead of wax), are they not the exact same thing inside? While this is not part of my original intent for this message, I want to ask if anyone remembers the old oil filled electrolytic caps in the 1930's and 40's radios? I never understood what the oil did inside of them. But what I do remember is having one of them "blow". *SCARY *****. I plugged in some ancient chassis with those old oil filled caps, and all of a sudden there was hot oil spraying all over me, from the tiny hole in the top of it. After that, I always put a tin can over those caps before plugging the device in. (or just replaced them). Those seemed to almost always be bad. (Probably why they were not used to too many years). |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 3:57:12 PM UTC-5, wrote:
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. I understand that the electrolytic caps contain chemicals which decay over time, from the chemicals corroding the metal parts. So, electrolytic caps should always be replaced. But why replace the old paper caps coated with wax? All they are, is metal foil and paper rolled up, and as long as the wax is sealing them to keep out moisture, why should they become defective? And for that matter, what are the new ones made from? Aside from being sealed inside of some sort of plastic (instead of wax), are they not the exact same thing inside? While this is not part of my original intent for this message, I want to ask if anyone remembers the old oil filled electrolytic caps in the 1930's and 40's radios? I never understood what the oil did inside of them. But what I do remember is having one of them "blow". *SCARY *****. I plugged in some ancient chassis with those old oil filled caps, and all of a sudden there was hot oil spraying all over me, from the tiny hole in the top of it. After that, I always put a tin can over those caps before plugging the device in. (or just replaced them). Those seemed to almost always be bad. (Probably why they were not used to too many years). If you remove every paper and foil capacitor from an old tube anything and check them on a quality checker, you'll find most if not all showing some sort of defect. They may read OK value wise, but run a few hundred volts through them and you'll find most have a lot of internal leakage. The fact is that moisture does eventually penetrate the capacitors and causes problems. I've heard that old Radiolas use large banks of paper and foil capacitors instead of electrolytics and most do just fine with their original caps. Supposedly it's because of the particularly fine rice paper imported from Japan used to construct these capacitors during the 1920s. These rice paper caps might escape degradation over the decades. Perhaps those who've restored a bunch of these can comment if they actually did dynamic testing of the capacitors. |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:38:45 -0600, Foxs Mercantile
wrote: On 2/2/2017 2:53 PM, wrote: Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. Most "old" radios are from 1930-1960. That makes them 87-57 years old. Manufacturing has changed a lot. I change all the caps simply because I don't waste my time "troubleshooting" bad caps. Bad caps can cause collateral damage. Why risk it for the cost (low) of replacement parts? Old electrolytic filter caps dry out. It's a fools game to waste time trying to reform them. Paper dielectric capacitor absorb moisture and that combines with the acids in the paper and cause them to fail. For the most part, mica, silver dipped mica and ceramic capacitors are very reliable. The band ones, you can find AFTER you've replaced the usual suspects and can actually trouble shoot the radio rather than running around in circles chasing known bad parts. Yes, I've had to replace the occasional vacuum tube, or found an open coil, but for the most part 99% of the radios I've worked on, worked to a fashion by just replacing known bad parts. I.e. Paper and electrolytic capacitors. I'm 66 years old. According to my doctor, I dont have any bad capacitors, (just arthritis). Seriously, I wonder what the life expectancy is for the new caps (meaning the replacements for the wax coated paper caps. ???) And what are these newer ones made from? I know the mica and ceramic caps are reliable and last almost forever. A for electrolytic caps, it seems that the newer ones have a much shorter life than the old ones did. You'd think that it would be the other way around with modern technology, but today the name of the game to to make stuff as cheaply as possible, for profit, not long life. After all, today's electronics, cars, even homes are disposible. That's why those old radios still work after 60 or 80 years, while most stuff made today is in a landfill in less than 10 years. One other thing that most people dont know, is that if we have a nuclear blast, all of the semiconductors will cease to work. That means all modern electronics, radios, tvs, cpmputers, cars, and darn near everything around us, will stop working. The only stuff that will still work are tube based electronics and vehicles made which still have ignition points in their distributors. Most likely WE wont survive either, but if we do, all we will have is the old stuff from the 1960s and earlier, to rely on. The internet will be gone, since it's all run with silicon. Most radio transmissions will also be gone, except those still powered with tubes. This day is coming soon, and we will be tossed back into the early 1900s. Thats why we need to keep this old technology alive. The gear we relied on during WW2 is the gear we will rely on once again during the upcoming WW3. |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:53:42 -0600, oldschool wrote:
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. I understand that the electrolytic caps contain chemicals which decay over time, from the chemicals corroding the metal parts. So, electrolytic caps should always be replaced. But why replace the old paper caps coated with wax? All they are, is metal foil and paper rolled up, and as long as the wax is sealing them to keep out moisture, why should they become defective? And for that matter, what are the new ones made from? Aside from being sealed inside of some sort of plastic (instead of wax), are they not the exact same thing inside? While this is not part of my original intent for this message, I want to ask if anyone remembers the old oil filled electrolytic caps in the 1930's and 40's radios? I never understood what the oil did inside of them. But what I do remember is having one of them "blow". *SCARY *****. I plugged in some ancient chassis with those old oil filled caps, and all of a sudden there was hot oil spraying all over me, from the tiny hole in the top of it. After that, I always put a tin can over those caps before plugging the device in. (or just replaced them). Those seemed to almost always be bad. (Probably why they were not used to too many years). Actually, the electrolytic capacitors are more likely to be good than the paper capacitors. Almost all of the paper capacitors I have from the "old days" are bad, even if they were never used while a small number of the electrolytics are still functional. The paper capacitors were made of sheets of foil separated by paper, "sealed" in wax. Unfortunately, wax isn't a very good seal; moisture can penetrate it. These capacitors were a know failure point 10 years after a set was made. There just wasn't anything better to replace them with (at a reasonable price). Modern capacitors are made from plastic film that is much less affected by moisture and is a better insulator in the first place. The old electrolytic capacitors you are talking about don't sound like the oil filled variety. Indeed, if they are electrolytic, they aren't oil filled. Oil filled capacitors aren't polarized and many of them are good today. They were the high quality capacitors used in military and premium industrial equipment; you seldom find them in consumer gear unless someone has repaired it with surplus parts. The capacitors you talk about are more likely wet electrolytics. They aren't filled with oil but with an acid. They are indeed all bad; don't power a set that has them. Sometimes they leak if you turn them upside down (the vent hole you mentioned). And be careful not to puncture them while you are removing them. If there is still any acid inside, it will corrode any metal it gets on. You can still get high quality electrolytic capacitors from authorized distributors like Mouser or Digi-Key. No-name ones from Amazon or Ebay are likely to be junk. Name brand ones from these latter sources may be counterfeit. While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. -- Jim Mueller To get my real email address, replace wrongname with dadoheadman. Then replace nospam with fastmail. Lastly, replace com with us. |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:44:53 -0600, wrote:
I'm 66 years old. According to my doctor, I dont have any bad capacitors, (just arthritis). I'm 69 years old. My body mechanic says I have pump and inside plumbing problems. Perhaps I should replace him with a plumber? Seriously, I wonder what the life expectancy is for the new caps (meaning the replacements for the wax coated paper caps. ???) There are online lifetime calculators for electrolytic and other types of capacitors. For example: http://www.illinoiscapacitor.com/tech-center/life-calculators.aspx http://www.chemi-con.com/education (click on Capacitor Life) The major culprit is internal heating from high ripple current resulting the electrolyte leaking or evaporating. Temperature also has a big effect. There are graphs on the capacitor data sheets that approximate the lifetime characteristics. And what are these newer ones made from? For electrolytics, try polymer caps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_capacitor#Lifetime.2C_service_life http://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/Panasonic_Capacitors_WP_final.PDF I know the mica and ceramic caps are reliable and last almost forever. Not all ceramics are that reliable. MLCC (multi-layer ceramic caps) are rather fragile and microphonic. A for electrolytic caps, it seems that the newer ones have a much shorter life than the old ones did. Nope. The old ones filtered at 120 Hz. The new caps filter at 100 to 300 KHz. Internal dissipation follows frequency. That's why those old radios still work after 60 or 80 years, while most stuff made today is in a landfill in less than 10 years. Todays products are intentionally designed to be difficult to repair and to only last as long as the warranty period. With the proper design tools and models, it is possible to predict the life of an electronic (or mechanical) product. Anything that lasts longer than the warranty period is deemed to be "over-designed". It is then redesigned using lower rating or cost components so that everything blows up at the same time. I've seen it happen. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
wrote:
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. One of the factors that is often overlooked is the tolerance of the circuit to the various types of wear-out mechanism. If a cathode by-pass capacitor on the sound output valve goes leaky, it would have to leak very badly indeed (and measure only a few hundred ohms) before it upset the operating conditions of the valve. On the other hand, if an inter-stage coupling capacitor begin to leak and puts even a small proportion of the anode voltage of the first valve across the grid leak of the second, it will upset the second valve very badly and may even destroy it. Electrolytic smoothing capacitors in the HT line will leak even when brand new, but the leakage is usually fairly small once they have settled down. If they later begin to leak badly, this will cause internal heating and damage which may not be obvious - the set will appear to carry on working as normal. Eventually, when the leakage increases even more, something in the power supply will fail due to overloading or the capacitor itself bursts; but until that point, there may be no hint that things are going wrong because the circuit is reasonably tolerant of that sort of leakage. I have repaired QuadII amplifiers which almost met specification even though the internal voltages were all over the place, most of the capacitors were leaking and some of the resistors had changed value too. The initial design was intended to be tolerant of a wide range of component values (close-tolerance components were very expensive) so it wasn't badly upset by drift due to ageing. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On 02/02/2017 09:36 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:44:53 -0600, wrote: I'm 66 years old. According to my doctor, I dont have any bad capacitors, (just arthritis). I'm 69 years old. My body mechanic says I have pump and inside plumbing problems. Perhaps I should replace him with a plumber? Seriously, I wonder what the life expectancy is for the new caps (meaning the replacements for the wax coated paper caps. ???) There are online lifetime calculators for electrolytic and other types of capacitors. For example: http://www.illinoiscapacitor.com/tech-center/life-calculators.aspx http://www.chemi-con.com/education (click on Capacitor Life) The major culprit is internal heating from high ripple current resulting the electrolyte leaking or evaporating. Temperature also has a big effect. There are graphs on the capacitor data sheets that approximate the lifetime characteristics. And what are these newer ones made from? For electrolytics, try polymer caps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_capacitor#Lifetime.2C_service_life http://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/Panasonic_Capacitors_WP_final.PDF I know the mica and ceramic caps are reliable and last almost forever. Not all ceramics are that reliable. MLCC (multi-layer ceramic caps) are rather fragile and microphonic. A for electrolytic caps, it seems that the newer ones have a much shorter life than the old ones did. Nope. The old ones filtered at 120 Hz. The new caps filter at 100 to 300 KHz. Internal dissipation follows frequency. That's why those old radios still work after 60 or 80 years, while most stuff made today is in a landfill in less than 10 years. Todays products are intentionally designed to be difficult to repair and to only last as long as the warranty period. With the proper design tools and models, it is possible to predict the life of an electronic (or mechanical) product. Anything that lasts longer than the warranty period is deemed to be "over-designed". It is then redesigned using lower rating or cost components so that everything blows up at the same time. I've seen it happen. Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote a very funny poem about that, "The Deacon's Masterpiece, Or, The Wonderful One-Hoss Shay". Here it is, read by Eddie Albert. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiOHhhwnK6k Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 160 North State Road #203 Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 4:33:51 PM UTC-5, wrote:
Perhaps those who've restored a bunch of these can comment if they actually did dynamic testing of the capacitors. I have done a fair number of AK55s and their Radiola and other-brand contemporaries, using potted 1 & 2 uF paper caps. I will typically test them at 500VAC on a proper full-voltage cap tester. I have never, repeat, never found a bad potted paper cap in an undamaged device. The secret, in my opinion, is that the caps are massive (I have unpotted a couple for the sake of curiosity from rusted-out hulks), with wide clearances. The potting tar makes for an excellent seal as well. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On 2/3/2017 10:12 AM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 02/02/2017 09:36 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:44:53 -0600, wrote: .... Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote a very funny poem about that, "The Deacon's Masterpiece, Or, The Wonderful One-Hoss Shay". Here it is, read by Eddie Albert. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiOHhhwnK6k Cheers Phil Hobbs A wonderful poem and read very well. |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:12:56 -0500, Phil Hobbs
wrote: On 02/02/2017 09:36 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Todays products are intentionally designed to be difficult to repair and to only last as long as the warranty period. With the proper design tools and models, it is possible to predict the life of an electronic (or mechanical) product. Anything that lasts longer than the warranty period is deemed to be "over-designed". It is then redesigned using lower rating or cost components so that everything blows up at the same time. I've seen it happen. Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote a very funny poem about that, "The Deacon's Masterpiece, Or, The Wonderful One-Hoss Shay". Here it is, read by Eddie Albert. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiOHhhwnK6k Cheers Phil Hobbs Thanks, that was good and quite appropriate. While attending college, I lived for a time in a large old house aptly named "the fire trap". I could hear termites chewing away in the walls. About 3 years after graduating, I returned to visit the school, and drove by house. It looked much the same as when I lived there. The next day, on my way out of town, I drove by again and found that the house had collapsed in a heap. No wall was left standing. According to the news, it had fallen down by itself and without warning, injuring a few students in the process. It's much like the medieval cathedrals, bridges, and other structures, where the failure of one tiny arch, will cause the entire structure to collapse. In a previous life, I tried to design a "warranty timer" into a product. Actually, it was suppose to accumulate and display the amount of time that the unit had been powered on to help establish maintenance intervals. In previous products, a mechanical counter-timer was used, but for this version, it was deemed too big and expensive. http://www.alliedelec.com/images/products/Small/70132720.jpg I found a company that made an electrochemical equivalent. It was housed in a glass cylinder, similar to a common 3AG glass fuse. Inside was some chemical solution. When a few volts of DC was applied, electrolytic action caused one end to slowly turn dark, thus indicating the amount of time that the DC was applied. Sorry, but I couldn't find the vendor or an equivalent online. When the required maintenance was performed, the indicator would be replaced as it could not be reset. During the design phase, I liked to joke about installing a 2nd timer in the product, which would blow it up after a specified operating life. I even designed a place for it on one of PCB's. I stopped joking after I found that management was taking me seriously and discussing such things was how to handle extended warranties. The device was later removed in a cost reduction exercise, but the component outline remained in the printed manual, resulting in numerous embarrassing questions because someone had labeled the part as a "warranty timer". -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:32:07 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:12:56 -0500, Phil Hobbs wrote: On 02/02/2017 09:36 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Todays products are intentionally designed to be difficult to repair and to only last as long as the warranty period. With the proper design tools and models, it is possible to predict the life of an electronic (or mechanical) product. Anything that lasts longer than the warranty period is deemed to be "over-designed". It is then redesigned using lower rating or cost components so that everything blows up at the same time. I've seen it happen. Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote a very funny poem about that, "The Deacon's Masterpiece, Or, The Wonderful One-Hoss Shay". Here it is, read by Eddie Albert. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiOHhhwnK6k Cheers Phil Hobbs Thanks, that was good and quite appropriate. While attending college, I lived for a time in a large old house aptly named "the fire trap". I could hear termites chewing away in the walls. About 3 years after graduating, I returned to visit the school, and drove by house. It looked much the same as when I lived there. The next day, on my way out of town, I drove by again and found that the house had collapsed in a heap. No wall was left standing. According to the news, it had fallen down by itself and without warning, injuring a few students in the process. It's much like the medieval cathedrals, bridges, and other structures, where the failure of one tiny arch, will cause the entire structure to collapse. In a previous life, I tried to design a "warranty timer" into a product. Actually, it was suppose to accumulate and display the amount of time that the unit had been powered on to help establish maintenance intervals. In previous products, a mechanical counter-timer was used, but for this version, it was deemed too big and expensive. http://www.alliedelec.com/images/products/Small/70132720.jpg I found a company that made an electrochemical equivalent. It was housed in a glass cylinder, similar to a common 3AG glass fuse. Inside was some chemical solution. When a few volts of DC was applied, electrolytic action caused one end to slowly turn dark, thus indicating the amount of time that the DC was applied. Sorry, but I couldn't find the vendor or an equivalent online. When the required maintenance was performed, the indicator would be replaced as it could not be reset. During the design phase, I liked to joke about installing a 2nd timer in the product, which would blow it up after a specified operating life. I even designed a place for it on one of PCB's. I stopped joking after I found that management was taking me seriously and discussing such things was how to handle extended warranties. The device was later removed in a cost reduction exercise, but the component outline remained in the printed manual, resulting in numerous embarrassing questions because someone had labeled the part as a "warranty timer". Something like a coulometer??? |
#13
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote:
While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! |
#14
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 2:08:40 PM UTC-5, Nick Danger wrote:
On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote: Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! You probably don't know this, but it's not a *real clock*. It's one of those cardboard affairs that we used to teach our children how to tell time. Some snowflakes have one that they labelled "Doomsday" on it in crayon and they move the hands one way or the other depending on how *they* feel about things. If there were no Muslims and Communists, this would be a pretty peaceful world actually. And speaking of Communists, it was lovely of the outgoing U.S. president to throw the cold war back decades before he left. That's a heck of a job! |
#15
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
Lemme See:
Austria in 1936. Chamberlain: Peace in our Time. And we all know how that turned out. Crimea in 2016. Ukraine in 2017? It is a shooting war to this day, and Ukraine is losing. tRump: Peace in our time, and let's go to bed. Expect any different? Only this time with Nukes. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron. In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican. H. L. Mencken Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#16
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:50:22 +0000, Adrian Tuddenham wrote:
wrote: Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. One of the factors that is often overlooked is the tolerance of the circuit to the various types of wear-out mechanism. snip True. But the reason to replace them ALL is that if you only replace the one(s) causing a problem, another will fail later, then another still later. It is much easier to do them all at once than to have to repair the same unit over and over as they fail one after another. Been there, done that. -- Jim Mueller To get my real email address, replace wrongname with dadoheadman. Then replace nospam with fastmail. Lastly, replace com with us. |
#17
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
wrote in message ... Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. I understand that the electrolytic caps contain chemicals which decay over time, from the chemicals corroding the metal parts. So, electrolytic caps should always be replaced. But why replace the old paper caps coated with wax? All they are, is metal foil and paper rolled up, and as long as the wax is sealing them to keep out moisture, why should they become defective? Waxed paper capacitors are notorious for moisture absorbtion and becoming leaky. There are plenty of other types of dry capacitors that don't last forever in the high temperature around tubes. |
#18
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:38:45 -0600, Foxs Mercantile wrote: On 2/2/2017 2:53 PM, wrote: Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. Most "old" radios are from 1930-1960. That makes them 87-57 years old. Manufacturing has changed a lot. I change all the caps simply because I don't waste my time "troubleshooting" bad caps. Bad caps can cause collateral damage. Why risk it for the cost (low) of replacement parts? Old electrolytic filter caps dry out. It's a fools game to waste time trying to reform them. Paper dielectric capacitor absorb moisture and that combines with the acids in the paper and cause them to fail. For the most part, mica, silver dipped mica and ceramic capacitors are very reliable. The band ones, you can find AFTER you've replaced the usual suspects and can actually trouble shoot the radio rather than running around in circles chasing known bad parts. Yes, I've had to replace the occasional vacuum tube, or found an open coil, but for the most part 99% of the radios I've worked on, worked to a fashion by just replacing known bad parts. I.e. Paper and electrolytic capacitors. I'm 66 years old. According to my doctor, I dont have any bad capacitors, (just arthritis). Seriously, I wonder what the life expectancy is for the new caps (meaning the replacements for the wax coated paper caps. ???) And what are these newer ones made from? I know the mica and ceramic caps are reliable and last almost forever. I've seen loads of ceramic caps fail - but mostly in TV horizontal scan sections where the frequency is over 15kHz and high voltage pulse conditions. This got worse with ever increasing PC monitor resolutions. AFAICR; mica caps were pretty reliable - in most of the places I found them, they were used for precision and a specific tempco. |
#19
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On 2/3/2017 2:08 PM, Nick Danger wrote:
On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote: While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! Get off of it. You lost. |
#20
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
|
#21
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
"Jim Mueller" wrote in message eb.com... On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:50:22 +0000, Adrian Tuddenham wrote: wrote: Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. One of the factors that is often overlooked is the tolerance of the circuit to the various types of wear-out mechanism. snip True. But the reason to replace them ALL is that if you only replace the one(s) causing a problem, another will fail later, then another still later. It is much easier to do them all at once than to have to repair the same unit over and over as they fail one after another. Been there, done that. So have I. |
#22
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Jim Mueller wrote:
On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:50:22 +0000, Adrian Tuddenham wrote: wrote: Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. One of the factors that is often overlooked is the tolerance of the circuit to the various types of wear-out mechanism. snip True. But the reason to replace them ALL is that if you only replace the one(s) causing a problem, another will fail later, then another still later. It is much easier to do them all at once than to have to repair the same unit over and over as they fail one after another. Been there, done that. And that brings in another issue. A lot of that old equipment is really hard to disassemble. So the effort to take it apart is greater than changing all the capacitors, so one might as well while the thing is apart. Low value capacitors don't cost much, so replacing them all won't kill most people. Electrolytics can be more expensive, but in consumer type tube equipment, there are only a few, in the power supply and bypassing the cathode in the audio stages, maybe a few more. It shifts with solid state equipment, a whole lot more electrolytics since transistors are low voltage low current (ie low impedance) rather than tube's high impedance. And then with switching supplies, electrolytics see much harder service since they are expected to filter AC frequencies above audio, while previously electrolytics only saw 120Hz or audio frequencies. That's another issue. The time tracking down one bad capacitor can be costly, if you just replace all the capacitors that may be as fast or faster than figuring out which one is bad (and then another capacitor of the same vintage may go bad the next week). Michael |
#23
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:08:37 -0500, Nick Danger
wrote: On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote: While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! Yes, precisely why I feel WW3 is a lot closer and more likely than before. This has nothing to do with my own political party preferences, or anything else, just the "person" himself (president). However, lets NOT get into a political discussion on here. Seems like everywhere on the internet has turned to politics lately. But I still do not feel safe, with the current state of the world and the current US president. It seemed a lot safer before, even though the world in general seems a lot worse than it was in the last few decades. |
#24
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
wrote in message ... On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:08:37 -0500, Nick Danger wrote: On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote: While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! Yes, precisely why I feel WW3 is a lot closer and more likely than before. This has nothing to do with my own political party preferences, or anything else, just the "person" himself (president). However, lets NOT get into a political discussion on here. Seems like everywhere on the internet has turned to politics lately. But I still do not feel safe, with the current state of the world and the current US president. It seemed a lot safer before, even though the world in general seems a lot worse than it was in the last few decades. Trump is using executive orders for everything, that's basically ruling by decree - I don't know how that's any different to a dictatorship. |
#25
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:36:08 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:44:53 -0600, wrote: I'm 66 years old. According to my doctor, I dont have any bad capacitors, (just arthritis). I'm 69 years old. My body mechanic says I have pump and inside plumbing problems. Perhaps I should replace him with a plumber? Definitely sounds like you need a plumber Seriously, I wonder what the life expectancy is for the new caps (meaning the replacements for the wax coated paper caps. ???) There are online lifetime calculators for electrolytic and other types of capacitors. For example: http://www.illinoiscapacitor.com/tech-center/life-calculators.aspx http://www.chemi-con.com/education (click on Capacitor Life) The major culprit is internal heating from high ripple current resulting the electrolyte leaking or evaporating. Temperature also has a big effect. There are graphs on the capacitor data sheets that approximate the lifetime characteristics. OK And what are these newer ones made from? For electrolytics, try polymer caps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_capacitor#Lifetime.2C_service_life http://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/Panasonic_Capacitors_WP_final.PDF So, what are the BEST ones? For example, I am getting a Hallicrafters sx-99 radio, to recap it, what should I use for the small caps (not electrolytics)? Should I use the "orange drops", or is there something better? I'd rather spend a few bucks more and get the best. By the way, why are all the caps now rated at some oddball figure. For example, instead of .05, it's ,047? or instead of .003 it's .0033. Same for the 'lytics instead of 30mf, they are 33mf and so on..... I know the mica and ceramic caps are reliable and last almost forever. Not all ceramics are that reliable. MLCC (multi-layer ceramic caps) are rather fragile and microphonic. What do those look like? Are they the ones with colored dots that look like dominos? (But I think those are mica caps, if I'm not mistaken). I remember those squarish brown ones with the leads on the bottom, those were supposed to be superior. (Silver mica, maybe?) And the round ceramics were said to be good too. A for electrolytic caps, it seems that the newer ones have a much shorter life than the old ones did. Nope. The old ones filtered at 120 Hz. The new caps filter at 100 to 300 KHz. Internal dissipation follows frequency. Can you explain that. I dont understand... (I would think that a 'lytic in a power supply would only need to filter at 120hz, or would some filter at 60hz also, depending on the configuration? That's why those old radios still work after 60 or 80 years, while most stuff made today is in a landfill in less than 10 years. Todays products are intentionally designed to be difficult to repair and to only last as long as the warranty period. With the proper design tools and models, it is possible to predict the life of an electronic (or mechanical) product. Anything that lasts longer than the warranty period is deemed to be "over-designed". It is then redesigned using lower rating or cost components so that everything blows up at the same time. I've seen it happen. I totally agree. You cant identify parts anymore and if you can, you cant get them. Especially ICs. In the 60s and 70s, I loved to work on electronics. Mostly tube stuff. The early transistor stuff was not too bad, but as soon as they began using ICs, I lost interest in working on it. Now, 40+ years later, I am gtting back into it, but only working on antique tube stuff, which is what i enjoy. Modern stuff is far too complicated, far too small (hard to see with my aging eyes too), and does nothing but frustrate me. Sure, I have built every computer I have owned (or rebuilt from parts of thrown away ones). But with computers you just change boards, not individual components. I guess going back to the tube stuff makes me feel young again! |
#26
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
|
#27
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:05:19 -0000, "Benderthe.evilrobot"
wrote: wrote in message .. . Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment? It seems that some people advocate that. I understand that the electrolytic caps contain chemicals which decay over time, from the chemicals corroding the metal parts. So, electrolytic caps should always be replaced. But why replace the old paper caps coated with wax? All they are, is metal foil and paper rolled up, and as long as the wax is sealing them to keep out moisture, why should they become defective? Waxed paper capacitors are notorious for moisture absorbtion and becoming leaky. There are plenty of other types of dry capacitors that don't last forever in the high temperature around tubes. I have been reading alot of websites about caps. One of them said the wax coated ones were less leaky (for moisture), than the old plastic coated ones. I am referring to the ones called "black beauties", that have color code bands on them.Yet, back in the early 70's, I knew a guy who was a retired radio-tv repairman as well as a Ham operator, and he used to say those "black beauties" were far better than the wax ones. (as well as the other plastic encased ones with the numbers on them instead of the color bands). That's conflicting info. Yet I know that all of them are paper caps. |
#28
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
|
#29
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:18:02 -0500, Tom Biasi
wrote: On 2/3/2017 2:08 PM, Nick Danger wrote: On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote: While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! Get off of it. You lost. Lets NOT go there..... In all honesty, I think WE ALL LOST. But we would have lost with either of the lousy candidates we had to pick from. Enough politics..... Lets stick to electronics. A lot more fun, and likely a lot safer too.... I'd rather get zapped by a high voltage power supply than a president with his fingers on the nuclear botton. |
#30
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:12:30 -0000, "Benderthe.evilrobot"
wrote: wrote in message And what are these newer ones made from? I know the mica and ceramic caps are reliable and last almost forever. I've seen loads of ceramic caps fail - but mostly in TV horizontal scan sections where the frequency is over 15kHz and high voltage pulse conditions. This got worse with ever increasing PC monitor resolutions. AFAICR; mica caps were pretty reliable - in most of the places I found them, they were used for precision and a specific tempco. I could see them failing in the HV sections of ol CRT televisions and monitors. Alot of stuff seemed to fail at those high voltages. But in radios and audio amps, they seem darn near fail proof.... |
#31
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
|
#32
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:39:02 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:32:07 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote: In a previous life, I tried to design a "warranty timer" into a product. Actually, it was suppose to accumulate and display the amount of time that the unit had been powered on to help establish maintenance intervals. In previous products, a mechanical counter-timer was used, but for this version, it was deemed too big and expensive. http://www.alliedelec.com/images/products/Small/70132720.jpg I found a company that made an electrochemical equivalent. It was housed in a glass cylinder, similar to a common 3AG glass fuse. Inside was some chemical solution. When a few volts of DC was applied, electrolytic action caused one end to slowly turn dark, thus indicating the amount of time that the DC was applied. Sorry, but I couldn't find the vendor or an equivalent online. When the required maintenance was performed, the indicator would be replaced as it could not be reset. Something like a coulometer??? Sorta. The timer was basically a miniature electroplating bath, which used a the current flow to move ions of something, from one end of a glass cylinder to the other. A coulomb is 1 amp for 1 second and can count both electrons and ions, as in the bath. http://www.electrolytics.org/faradaysLaw.html I have a box buried somewhere with the project notes which might have the data sheet. Meanwhile, I think I may have found the patent, or rather a later patent as the one I used was in about 1976: https://www.google.com/patents/US6198701 I'll dig through the citations later... -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#33
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
In article t, Ralph Mowery wrote: Capacitors such as .047 have been around a long time. I don't know why it is such an odd value as I doubt the extra .003 would be noticable in the circuits most of them are used in. As the tollorance on most of the electrolytics are very broad I don't understand the odd values either. If you look at the standard values used for resistors and capacitors and inductors, you can see that they tend to be spaced in a way which creates something approximating a geometric ratio - that is, each value in the series is 1-point-something times the previous value. The higher-precision value "kit" has a total of 24 values over each decade. The common lower-precision value kit has six values (every fourth, from the 24-value higher-precision range). The relationships aren't exact - 0.047 would be 0.046415... and some of the other "traditional" values are even further off of the geometric curve. But, that's the basics of it. I imagine that when picking the values which would go in the lower-precision set, it was easier to just choose the same nominal values as were used in the higher-precision set, and specify a lower tolerance (e.g. +/- 10% for a cheap film cap, or +100/-20 for a 'lytic). |
#34
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 16:38:26 -0600, wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:36:08 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote: And what are these newer ones made from? For electrolytics, try polymer caps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_capacitor#Lifetime.2C_service_life http://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/Panasonic_Capacitors_WP_final.PDF So, what are the BEST ones? For example, I am getting a Hallicrafters sx-99 radio, to recap it, what should I use for the small caps (not electrolytics)? Should I use the "orange drops", or is there something better? I'd rather spend a few bucks more and get the best. I'll defer to the those from the antique radio forum, who have more experience with this than me. I have helped various friends rebuild old HF radios. I tend to replace parts involving RF with parts that have the same temperature coefficient. So, mica caps get replaced with silver mica caps. Ceramics get replaced by ceramics of approximately the same value, voltage, and tempco. Film caps are potentially a problem, but I've seen few of those in old tube radios. Bumble bee, black beauty, and orange drop caps are junk. There's no temperature coefficient involved with those, so just whatever I can find that has similar values in polycarbonate or polypropylene. This should help: http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/set/messages/7/75075.html By the way, why are all the caps now rated at some oddball figure. For example, instead of .05, it's ,047? or instead of .003 it's .0033. Get out your calculator and estimate the acceptable range of values based on the tolerance. For example, a 0.047uF +/- 10% cap can vary between 0.042 and 0.052uF. Therefore, a 0.050uF is just fine. Actually, if you measure the caps involved with an LRC meter, you'll find that they vary well outside of the original specifications. Just because a capacitor is marked +/-10% doesn't mean that the circuit requires the same tolerance range. Same for the 'lytics instead of 30mf, they are 33mf and so on..... Most cheapo electrolytics are +100% -20%. So for 30uF, anything between 60uF and 24uF should work. Again, electrolytics are not that critical (or very accurate). Occasionally, there will be an electrolytic in some kind of audio filter that has to be fairly accurate. You can use the schematic to find those. The rest (power supply, decoupling, interstage audio coupling, cathode bypass, etc), can be fairly loose with the tolerances. Not all ceramics are that reliable. MLCC (multi-layer ceramic caps) are rather fragile and microphonic. What do those look like? Are they the ones with colored dots that look like dominos? (But I think those are mica caps, if I'm not mistaken). You won't find any MLCC caps in tube radios. You'll find them in computah equipment in the form of large SMT chip caps, sometimes with leads and dipped in epoxy: https://www.google.com/search?q=mlcc+capacitor&tbm=isch The caps are evil and fragile. They vary in capacitance with mechanical pressure and make a tolerable capacitance microphone. Touch one end, but not the other, with a soldering iron, and the temperature differential will cause internal cracking and eventually a short. I remember those squarish brown ones with the leads on the bottom, those were supposed to be superior. (Silver mica, maybe?) Silver mica. They're very good parts and rarely die unless you cram too much power through them as in a transmitter. https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=silver+mica+capacitors Watch out for the tempco on those. It's printed on the case as NPO, N750, N1500, Y5V, Y5P, etc. And the round ceramics were said to be good too. Those are called "disc ceramic" capacitors: https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=disc+ceramic+capacitor Same warnings are silver mica. A for electrolytic caps, it seems that the newer ones have a much shorter life than the old ones did. Nope. The old ones filtered at 120 Hz. The new caps filter at 100 to 300 KHz. Internal dissipation follows frequency. Can you explain that. I dont understand... (I would think that a 'lytic in a power supply would only need to filter at 120hz, or would some filter at 60hz also, depending on the configuration? Well, ok. I don't know of any tube radios that use switching power supplies, so yes, the highest frequency a tube radio power supply will see is 120 Hz. However, you comment was "for electrolytic caps, it seems that the newer ones have a much shorter life than the old ones did". By "newer one's", I assumed newer capacitors in newer circuits, namely switching power supplies. My guess(tm) is that newer capacitors will have the same long life as the originals (20+ years) when used as a replacement in a 120 Hz power supply. I guess going back to the tube stuff makes me feel young again! Sigh. My collection of test equipment looks more like a museum than a working test bench. I also find myself fixing 40+ years old test equipment as I do fixing radios etc. Looking at the old stuff, all it does is make me feel old and tired. Good luck. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#35
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 16:50:33 -0600, wrote:
I have been reading alot of websites about caps. One of them said the wax coated ones were less leaky (for moisture), than the old plastic coated ones. I am referring to the ones called "black beauties", that have color code bands on them.Yet, back in the early 70's, I knew a guy who was a retired radio-tv repairman as well as a Ham operator, and he used to say those "black beauties" were far better than the wax ones. (as well as the other plastic encased ones with the numbers on them instead of the color bands). That's conflicting info. Yet I know that all of them are paper caps. Nope. The black beauty caps are di film dielectric, which is a sandwich of mylar and paper. I think they might have been injected with oil after assembly, but I'm not certain. You must have missed something in your youth as everyone I knew that was fixing TV's would break one open to see what was inside. The preceding caps were bumble bee caps, which were oiled paper dielectric. The succeeding caps were orange drop caps which are metalized mylar dielectric. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#36
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
|
#37
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote: While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. On 2/3/2017 2:08 PM, Nick Danger wrote: Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! On 2/3/2017 4:18 PM, Tom Biasi wrote: Get off of it. You lost. Sorry that you totally missed the point. Losing has NOTHING to do with it. The current president would be just as great of a danger to the country and world if he were a Democrat. Creating an additional nuclear threat in today's unstable world was not the smartest thing to do. You won -- but what did you win? A vindictive, vengeful, thin-skinned, unstable*, erratic* person with his finger on the nuclear button. Sounds like a "win" to me. NOT! * BTW, these two words were used by the Wall Street Journal when describing the current president. |
#38
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tubeequipment?
On 2/3/2017 5:16 PM, wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:08:37 -0500, Nick Danger wrote: On 2/2/2017 9:13 PM, Jim Mueller wrote: While tube electronics may survive a nuclear war, it is irrelevant. There won't be any electricity to run them. The power plants are controlled by computers. Likewise, having your own generator won't help either. Many of the new ones are also semiconductor based, and you won't be able to get gas to run them since the pumps at the gas station are run by electricity which won't be available. Solar cells are also semiconductors and the inverters used with them also use semiconductors. So, if there is a WW3, don't count on ANYTHING electrical working. Seeing as you brought up WW3, for those of you that may not know it, a new president singlehandedly advanced the Doomsday Clock by 30 seconds just last week. Heck of a job! Yes, precisely why I feel WW3 is a lot closer and more likely than before. This has nothing to do with my own political party preferences, or anything else, just the "person" himself (president). However, lets NOT get into a political discussion on here. Seems like everywhere on the internet has turned to politics lately. But I still do not feel safe, with the current state of the world and the current US president. It seemed a lot safer before, even though the world in general seems a lot worse than it was in the last few decades. On 2/3/2017 5:45 PM, Tom Biasi wrote: It's a very complex issue. Your feelings are just that, yours. Sorry, personal, individual "feelings" has NOTHING to do with moving the Doomsday Clock ahead. The whole world might take exception, do ya think? |
#39
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
|
#40
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Why should someone replace ALL the capacitors on old Tube equipment?
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
A for electrolytic caps, it seems that the newer ones have a much shorter life than the old ones did. Nope. The old ones filtered at 120 Hz. The new caps filter at 100 to 300 KHz. Internal dissipation follows frequency. ** Complete ********. Electro cap dissipation is lower at high frequencies cos the ESR is lower at such frequencies. The no 1 reason for short lifspan is being sited next to heat sources, like power resistors and heatsinks. The no 2 reason is bad manufacture by no name brands in China etc. ...... Phil |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Video: Replace your car battery with capacitors! 12V BoostPack Update | Home Repair | |||
Buy or Sell your Used Construction Equipment; ie. excavators, backhoes, dozers, graders, cranes, compactors, dump trucks, heavy trucks, forestry equipment, farming equipment, mining equipment and much more.... | Home Repair | |||
Replace the tube or chuck it? | Electronics Repair | |||
Replace old fluorescent tube with brighter? | UK diy | |||
Replace PC Motherboard Capacitor:Low Impedance or ESR Capacitors? | Electronics Repair |