On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 00:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 01:31:29 +0000, Stormin' Norman
wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 20:05:03 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 22:25:54 +0000, Stormin' Norman
wrote:

Mea culpa, I should have written "post election, national demographic
study". Washington D.C. is not representative of the bulk of the
nation.

But it is typical of the "urban" parts of pretty much all of the big
cities. We have about a half square mile of Ft Myers with the same
statistics as DC. (crime, unwed birth, and welfare)


If someone can actually come up with some reasonably reputable
demographics of those who voted for Trump and those who voted for
Clinton, I would find it interesting.

This pew research study was published on 9 November so I am not sure
how they could have compiled demographics based upon the actual vote.

http://pewrsr.ch/2gwPa4F

It appears that Trump did not do well with women, most minority groups
and those with higher levels of education. Regardless, we are all
citizens and we all have exactly one vote, regardless of how anyone
wishes to diminish the importance of another person's vote.


The shocker for the democrats is that Trump got any women and minority
votes at all. That is just how out of touch they are with people out
in the countryside. I was surprised myself at how many suburban women
had Trump stickers on their car or posting about him on Facebook. It
is like the absurd assumption that all women support unfettered
abortion and gun control or that naturalized citizens support illegal
immigration.

Been voting conservative since my first presidential election in 1944
(Dewey) and I was mortified that anyone at all supported Trump.

I was also shocked some cousins on my father's side supported
Mussolini throughout the 30's and some on my mother's side supported
Hitler, apparently until the end of the war, two of which were in the
Waffen-SS.

I guess I am overly sensitive and resistant to fascism / fascists /
totalitarians.