On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 14:28:02 UTC, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:

Right. So let's just add yet another hazard. Very logical that.

That doesn't even make sense. You're in any crap you can throw mode now.

When someone is proved wrong then goes on to say 'and what about this'
(iffy cornering or whatever) it simply shows them up as a bad loser.

So you missed the point and drew childish conclusions. What's new.

I didn't miss any point. You just threw in some red herrings after you'd
been shown to be talking ****e.

OK, so you understand not a whole lot here

No vehicle is ever perfectly safe.

No road going vehicle is safe at all.

OK. So lets just add in a few more things to make it worse.

that makes no sense

You just know
it makes sense.

But thinking it OK to allow something silly like a battery which isn't
secured is just plain nonsense. And that was known long before ABS or
crumple zones where thought of.

Well I won't repeat my point, since you completely failed to grasp it
last time. But I think it's fair to say many relics on the road have far
larger issues than that, yet lower than average death stats. But I don't
think you'll undertand that.

And you think that somehow down to the vehicle design?

I won't ask what idiocy you imagine I believe this time. I don't care.

Any other stupid
beliefs you have that need sorting?

Yes, that you're worth talking to. Plonk.