"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:54:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 19:52:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:49:07 +0100, Huge
wrote:

On 2016-08-01, Steve Walker wrote:
On 01/08/2016 19:39, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:16:19 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news
[38 lines snipped]

Takes 2 minutes for a couple of cleaners to pick up the bits.

Meanwhile the trains are stopped.

Makes more sense to discourage them from jumping in front
of the train if that is possible.

For 2 lousy minutes?

And how long before the traumatised driver can be calmed and talked
out
of his cab and another driver fetched to move the train?

Plus the police treat it as a crime scene, so it can be several hours
before train service is resumed.

Maybe they should get police who don't work so bloody slowly.

Not possible when you have to check if anyone saw the individual
who ended up under the train was pushed or deliberately jumped
or was blotto or drugged out of its brain and staggered over the
edge of the platform at the time the train happened to show up etc.

They have CCTV, they don't have to ask people.

They do when it isnt clear if someone just stumbled into someone
else and pushed them over the edge of the platform accidentally
or make it look like that when it was actually done deliberately.

The camera will show just as much as a witness, and without prejudice.

Even sillier than you usually manage. No camera can
record the victim saying something to the pusher.