"harry" wrote in message
...
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 15:55:04 UTC+1, Dan S. MacAbre wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
whisky-dave wrote:
What does surprise me is how many on here seem to prefer those with a
forked tongue to someone who appears sincere.

I do.

Yes. I can see that.

Would you realy prefer to trust someone "who appears sincere" than
someone with a forked tongue that because of it constantly lies ther
way
out of wet paper bags.

'Appears sincere' in that he hasn't changed his views much if at all
during his long career. But if you prefer the likes of Boris who does
so
overnight, that's fine with me.


Corbyn is consistent, and I respect that. But he did appear to change
his opinion on the referendum. Do you know any background to that? Was
he persuaded? Or was it misreported? I think that's why he found
himself unable to jump up and down with enthusiasm for staying in, and
has since been criticised for it. I think there was some inner conflict
there, but I don't really know. It's a genuine question, BTW. I'm no
great fan of partisan politics.

It is all part of his plan to take over the Labour party and Marxify it.

Even sillier than you usually manage. How odd that so many Labour
MPs want to get rid of Corbyn because they realise that with him
they will never have a hope in hell of ever being in govt any time soon.

All is planned.

Just another utterly silly conspiracy theory, bigot boy.

The suckers are falling for it too.

They aint suckers, they're actually those who
never like Blair and Brown hijacking what they
stupidly believe that Labour should be about.