Dave Plowman (News) wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Sorry - forgot you were so poor you could only afford one device.

Nothing to do with what it costs, everything to do with
being much more convenient to use the one device for
playing podcasts where ever you choose to listen to them.

And even a terminal ****wit such as yourself should have
noticed that high end smartphones cost a lot more than a TV.

And even a terminal ****wit like you would
know a smart phone is no use as a TV.

Even a terminal ****wit such as yourself should have noticed
that we were discussing podcasts, not TV programs.

Whereas a smart TV can also double up an audio only device.

I'm not so poor that I care. I much prefer to use the one device
to play podcasts wherever I happen to want listen to a podcast
and have enough of a clue to have the smartphone automatically
download all the podcasts that I like to listen to so when I want
to listen to something, I just select the one I want to listen to.

Fed through a decent amp and speakers.

Don’t need anything like that with podcasts.

Which as it happens is exactly what I've got in the kitchen.

I don’t watch any TV when in the kitchen.

But I do realise installing that sort of thing completely beyond you.

I do in fact have just that where I choose to watch
TV programs and have a much more sophisticated
system than any smart TV can ever be too.

Hence having to use some crappy phone.

Your TV is completely useless when not in the kitchen.