On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 19:59:31 UTC+1, ARW wrote:
tabbypurr wrote in message
...
On Sunday, 17 July 2016 20:27:12 UTC+1, ARW wrote:
tabbypurr wrote in message
...
On Sunday, 17 July 2016 16:13:24 UTC+1, ARW wrote:

You have no experience of this, so there's no actual knowledge going to come from you on this. That only leaves you with argument.

Well, lets look at the facts. I've been using this painting method for about
13 years, and it's served me just fine. The basic theory of glue content in
paint isn't complex, and the theory behind this method adds up too. You on
the other hand have never tried the method, have no valid facts or argument
to offer, and can only resort to verbal abuse, as is your tendency. Not much
more need be said.

FACT = "Well that's every professional painter and decorator I have ever
seen at work doing it wrong then."

no, that's an incorrect deduction based on a false dichotomy

ARGUMENT = "You are talking ****e again"

no, that's an invalid conclusion based on the false argument of appeal to the people

ABUSE = "" Can only resort to verbal abuse"

http://img.uvumi.com/photos/1197/big/******-1-.jpg

Try some visual abuse instead.

abuse normally means someone is incapable of accepting the facts or resolving the situation.

Experience is worth a lot more, but you've never tried the method. Despite that you're sure you know what you obviously don't.


NT