On 5/31/2016 3:13 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2016 20:58:04 +0100, Muggles
wrote:

On 5/31/2016 2:30 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2016 20:15:58 +0100, Muggles
wrote:

On Tue, 31 May 2016 19:27:59 +0100, "Mr Macaw" wrote:
There's no excuse to expose anyone to tobacco
smoke.


Nobody forces it upon you, we've told you that again
and again. Will you ****ing listen instead of
spouting your holier than thou ****? If you don't like
second hand smoke, GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.

Public places are for everyone, and this is about public health in
public places. Non-smokers shouldn't have to leave public places
because smoker's blow hazardous secondhand smoke

A public place is much bigger than the area created by smoke.

And what makes you think you have more rights than the smoker?

Smokers are allowed in public places - they just can't engage in smoking
while there.

Answer the question. Why do you think you have more rights to have it
smoke free than they do to have it smoky? You are a BIGOT.

What rights are you talking about?

--
Maggie