On Sun, 15 May 2016 23:39:14 +0100, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:57:55 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 15 May 2016 15:28:29 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 5/15/2016 3:05 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2016 10:20:18 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

There are no people forcing anyone to eat chocolate, coffee, potatos, or
fish. If people have illness as a result of allergies to those things
they don't go near them, and on top of that they aren't exposing other
people to any dangerous chemicals they have no choice by to breath.

Yes and? I dont make you breath my smoke. On the other hand..you dont
make me quit either. Sounds like a fair trade. Right?

Not really. It's not about 'fair trades'. I don't expect you to quit,
or even conclude that anything you do as a smoker hurts anyone around
you. I suppose I speak up on this topic because it means something to me.

hey...you would have to have a gas mask on your face for years at a
time...connected directly to my gas masks exhaust port, to get enough
"second hand smoke" (EEEEE!!! Run!!) to have ANY sort of medical
risk...unless you have medical issues of your own. Which you appear to
be victim of. You must curse your parents for their genetic "gift" to
you.

After years of exposure and damage to my body from secondhand smoke, I'm
highly allergic and reactive to not only cigarette smoke, but VOC's in
the air.

So your "years of exposure and damage from second hand smoke" has
given you lots of allergies and whatnot? Sucks to be you. Fortunately
you are a genetic sport, so most of us dont have to deal with you.
Shrug.

Since society had become aware of the real dangers of exposing people to
secondhand smoke, the world has become more and more secondhand smoke
FREE. Hopefully, as time progresses public places will completely ban
smoking, and that includes the niches people find to smoke while they
are at work. That's just a matter of time.


It's a fact that cigarette smoke hurts the people it comes in contact
with, including, the residue you carry on you in your hair and on your
clothes.

Really? Its a "fact"?

It IS a fact.
The preponderance of medical evidence over the last 20 yeares
supports the thesis that cigarrette smoke is dangerous to both the
smoker and those around who have to breathe the second-hand smoke.

On a scale of 1 to 100..whats the danger to both groups? Medical
evidence also holds that only 25% of smokers..life long smokers for
decades, have any health issues that might be related to smoking.

Which reminds me...a non smoker buddy of mine..comes from a non
smoking family, and works with no smokers..just died from lung cancer.

Maybe if he had been exposed to smoke, he wouldnt have died? Fun to
think about that isnt it? Same way people become innoculated.

Should have smoked cannabis. That stops cancer.

--
Red meat isn't bad for you. Fuzzy blue-green meat is bad for you.