On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:54:27 +0700,
wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:03:47 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:32:05 -0800 (PST), whit3rd
wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 2:03:51 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:09:31 -0800 (PST), whit3rd
wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 5:17:57 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote:
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/
Fascinating...really fascinating.....
No, irrelevant. You don't ignore the heat capacity of oceans, soil, and dismiss
the temperature of lower atmosphere that's in contact with the oceans and soil,
if you want a temperature measurement. That upper-atmosphere data is
of such a tiny bit of matter, by comparison, that it can be safely ignored.
The temperature of the vacuum of space is measurable; it can't tell you
anything about global warming, either.
Yet the global temperature has remained unchanged for 58 yrs..
In the last 58 years I recall, it has been cold every winter and warm every
summer. What planet are you from?
Were you dropped on your head recently, or did you have a stroke? Off
your meds? Or simply a Global Warming Zealot who is ****y about the
data I provided?
Gunner
Perhaps he was dropped on his head, or at least it appears that
someone was.The reference you gave (above) only shows Troposphere
temperatures and a second graph for radiosonde temperatures from 5,000
to 40,000 ft. Air temperature, in other words.
Yes and? Or are you thinking that ground temperature will be vastly
different and "more accurate" than corresponding air temperatures?
Lets see ...big industrial area..lots of pavement parking lots and
black asphalt...its going to read very hot..yet across the
street...snow on the ground ..
So what will the air temperature be above the area? Hummm?
Given that most recording thermometers have been located in ...urban
areas, airports just off the flight lines, on asphalt parking lots
rather than in rural areas ...what do YOU think the temp readings will
show? Humm?
The boffins call those areas.."heat islands". Given that until
recently, most measurements were made smack dab in the middle of those
"heat islands"...just how realistic do you think they are? Hummm?
Lets look at an infrared photo from above the Boston area shall we?
http://www.urbanheatislands.com/_/rs...urban_area.png
So tell me...which part of the photo has the correct overall
temperature? Hummm? Snicker....
http://www.urbanheatislands.com/\
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/11/1...-temperatures/
You may wish to read this article by a very respected meterologist
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&u act=8&ved=0ahUKEwib55Xz7bXLAhVG0GMKHe2UAOUQFggxMAM &url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.friendsofscience.org%2Fasset s%2Fdocuments%2FFoS_Urban%2520Heat%2520Island.pdf& usg=AFQjCNF1MWDH7FlW8-4F-zibGg1Qk-mghw&sig2=kLkf1w7gAXVA_kGsfoCCMw
Sorry about the long link..I dont know how to shorten it. Its a PDF
file. Get back to me AFTER you read it.
And even worse, both charts show a very distinct temperature change
from year to year.
Of course there is a temperature change from year to year. No two
years are ever the same. And? Its the long term average that is
used..not one year to the next. Im a dummy...but even I know that.
Do you really think that air temperature at 40,000 ft. is a realistic
indication of global, or any other sort of, warming? Especially when
it varies every year?
Yep. Or are you claiming that the temperature measured in downtown
Boston should be the calibration point? Really?
They say that "Early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy,
wealthy and wise", but apparently actually reading one's references
before opening one's mouth helps a lot in the "Wise" department.
So does knowing something about the subject. Apparently you seem to
jump on and wave around data points you have no comprehension about.
If Im the self admitted dummy...son..you are as stupid as a stone
statue.
Gunner
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus