Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 5:17:57 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote:
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/ Fascinating...really fascinating..... No, irrelevant. You don't ignore the heat capacity of oceans, soil, and dismiss the temperature of lower atmosphere that's in contact with the oceans and soil, if you want a temperature measurement. That upper-atmosphere data is of such a tiny bit of matter, by comparison, that it can be safely ignored. The temperature of the vacuum of space is measurable; it can't tell you anything about global warming, either. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:09:31 -0800 (PST), whit3rd
wrote: On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 5:17:57 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote: http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/ Fascinating...really fascinating..... No, irrelevant. You don't ignore the heat capacity of oceans, soil, and dismiss the temperature of lower atmosphere that's in contact with the oceans and soil, if you want a temperature measurement. That upper-atmosphere data is of such a tiny bit of matter, by comparison, that it can be safely ignored. The temperature of the vacuum of space is measurable; it can't tell you anything about global warming, either. Yet the global temperature has remained unchanged for 58 yrs..and the ice packs are as big as they have always been. Or are you claiming that they are not measuring the global temps properly? Please elucidate and tell us how its wrong, and give us examples of where its wrong. Take all the white space you need. And tell us why Nasa and Oceania data is bogus. Again..use all the white space you feel the need to use. We will be waiting with sunburned bated breath Gunner --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 2:03:51 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:09:31 -0800 (PST), whit3rd wrote: On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 5:17:57 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote: http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/ Fascinating...really fascinating..... No, irrelevant. You don't ignore the heat capacity of oceans, soil, and dismiss the temperature of lower atmosphere that's in contact with the oceans and soil, if you want a temperature measurement. That upper-atmosphere data is of such a tiny bit of matter, by comparison, that it can be safely ignored. The temperature of the vacuum of space is measurable; it can't tell you anything about global warming, either. Yet the global temperature has remained unchanged for 58 yrs.. In the last 58 years I recall, it has been cold every winter and warm every summer. What planet are you from? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:32:05 -0800 (PST), whit3rd
wrote: On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 2:03:51 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:09:31 -0800 (PST), whit3rd wrote: On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 5:17:57 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote: http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/ Fascinating...really fascinating..... No, irrelevant. You don't ignore the heat capacity of oceans, soil, and dismiss the temperature of lower atmosphere that's in contact with the oceans and soil, if you want a temperature measurement. That upper-atmosphere data is of such a tiny bit of matter, by comparison, that it can be safely ignored. The temperature of the vacuum of space is measurable; it can't tell you anything about global warming, either. Yet the global temperature has remained unchanged for 58 yrs.. In the last 58 years I recall, it has been cold every winter and warm every summer. What planet are you from? Were you dropped on your head recently, or did you have a stroke? Off your meds? Or simply a Global Warming Zealot who is ****y about the data I provided? Gunner --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
... On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:32:05 -0800 (PST), whit3rd wrote: On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 2:03:51 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:09:31 -0800 (PST), whit3rd wrote: On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 5:17:57 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote: http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/ Fascinating...really fascinating..... No, irrelevant. You don't ignore the heat capacity of oceans, soil, and dismiss the temperature of lower atmosphere that's in contact with the oceans and soil, if you want a temperature measurement. That upper-atmosphere data is of such a tiny bit of matter, by comparison, that it can be safely ignored. The temperature of the vacuum of space is measurable; it can't tell you anything about global warming, either. Yet the global temperature has remained unchanged for 58 yrs.. In the last 58 years I recall, it has been cold every winter and warm every summer. What planet are you from? Were you dropped on your head recently, or did you have a stroke? Off your meds? Or simply a Global Warming Zealot who is ****y about the data I provided? Gunner Here's another article for you: http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...on_record.html Dissent is a sacred duty of the Left, but a dangerous heresy from the Right. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a question.
If global warming is fake, how come those glaciers are shrinking? And so does the Arctic ice? i |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 2016, Ignoramus1161 wrote
(in ): I have a question. If global warming is fake, how come those glaciers are shrinking? And so does the Arctic ice? Do you recall when the name went from Global Warming to Climate Change? The reason for the new name is that the predicted rise in temperature is not happening. Instead, the rate of rise flattened out, and the deviation from prediction keeps increasing. There are many articles in the scientific press (here meaning Nature and Science, which I subscribe to) trying to explain the anomaly, without much success so far. The now common statement that current year is the warmest ever, while literally true, is misleading in that it does not address the fact that the rate of rise is not following the current models. The google search term for this is “climate hiatus”. Here is a graph showing the climate hiatus that people are trying to explain. The East Anglica folk were trying to obscure the toe of this failure to follow the models, and said if the hiatus continued for fifteen years, it would be a big problem. This was in 2009, but they were referring to the start of the divergence in 1995 or so. ..http://judithcurry.com/2015/12/17/cl...ersus-climate- reality/#more-20667 Also lots of comparisons of various models with observation. Judith Curry is an apostate in that she objected to the APS becoming an advocacy organization: ..http://judithcurry.com/2013/03/24/american-physical-society/ Joe Gwinn |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ignoramus1161" wrote in message
... I have a question. If global warming is fake, how come those glaciers are shrinking? And so does the Arctic ice? i You are being served cherry-picked data: http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/201...tinues-to-lose |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-03-09, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
On Mar 9, 2016, Ignoramus1161 wrote (in ): I have a question. If global warming is fake, how come those glaciers are shrinking? And so does the Arctic ice? Do you recall when the name went from Global Warming to Climate Change? The reason for the new name is that the predicted rise in temperature is not happening. Instead, the rate of rise flattened out, and the deviation from prediction keeps increasing. There are many articles in the scientific press (here meaning Nature and Science, which I subscribe to) trying to explain the anomaly, without much success so far. The now common statement that current year is the warmest ever, while literally true, is misleading in that it does not address the fact that the rate of rise is not following the current models. The google search term for this is ???climate hiatus???. Here is a graph showing the climate hiatus that people are trying to explain. The East Anglica folk were trying to obscure the toe of this failure to follow the models, and said if the hiatus continued for fifteen years, it would be a big problem. This was in 2009, but they were referring to the start of the divergence in 1995 or so. .http://judithcurry.com/2015/12/17/cl...ersus-climate- reality/#more-20667 Also lots of comparisons of various models with observation. Judith Curry is an apostate in that she objected to the APS becoming an advocacy organization: .http://judithcurry.com/2013/03/24/american-physical-society/ Joe Gwinn Joe, I am far from a believer in global warming. I have not yet made up my mind on it. I look for anything that I can find to confirm or disconfirm it. So far the best evidence for me was melting of glaciers. i |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 07:21:10 -0600, Ignoramus1161
wrote: I have a question. If global warming is fake, how come those glaciers are shrinking? And so does the Arctic ice? The earth goes through natural climate cycles every few hundred years. Europe (and probably the rest of the world but only European records survive) went through a mini-ice-age in the 1600's. The cycles seem to last about 1000 years so it seems to me that we're peaking on the warm side of this same cycle and should start cooling again in a hundred years or so. No one that matters denies that the earth is warming. The debate is over the cause. Those of us who haven't drank the Kool-aid have simply drawn the conclusion from data presented that the warming is part of a natural cycle. The problem is that this research has become politicized and moneyed. If you go along with anthropogenic global warming (AGM), there are vast riches and reputations to be made. OTOH, question the orthodoxy and you risk your career, your reputation and your funding. If AGM is so real then why do the True Believers have to fudge and make up data, tinker with models until they get the results they want and still the resulting warming is tiny and not statistically significant from the model of the natural cycle. There is ample history of this in science. Consider phlogiston from past years. The orthodoxy was that phlogiston was an undetectable substance that escaped from burning material and was the source of the fire and heat. When Priestly discovered oxygen and developed the oxidation theory of combustion, he was practically an outcast for many years. Or we can go back a few years to the hysteria over global cooling. Remember that one? I'm like a Misourian and demand that they "Show me" with hard data. John John DeArmond http://www.neon-john.com http://www.tnduction.com Tellico Plains, Occupied TN See website for email address |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No Gorbal warming...in...58 yrs.... | Metalworking | |||
OT Global warming | UK diy | |||
Global Warming and what you can do to against it | UK diy | |||
Musing about warming up. | Woodturning | |||
Warming up | Home Repair |