On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:09:31 -0800 (PST), whit3rd
wrote:

On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 5:17:57 PM UTC-8, Gunner Asch wrote:
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/

Fascinating...really fascinating.....

No, irrelevant. You don't ignore the heat capacity of oceans, soil, and dismiss
the temperature of lower atmosphere that's in contact with the oceans and soil,
if you want a temperature measurement. That upper-atmosphere data is
of such a tiny bit of matter, by comparison, that it can be safely ignored.
The temperature of the vacuum of space is measurable; it can't tell you
anything about global warming, either.

Yet the global temperature has remained unchanged for 58 yrs..and the
ice packs are as big as they have always been. Or are you claiming
that they are not measuring the global temps properly? Please
elucidate and tell us how its wrong, and give us examples of where its
wrong. Take all the white space you need.

And tell us why Nasa and Oceania data is bogus. Again..use all the
white space you feel the need to use.

We will be waiting with sunburned bated breath

Gunner

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus