On 2016-01-21, Paul M. Cook wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:06:02 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

False. You can't prove that either way since accident rate is influenced by
a myriad of factors many of which have absolutely nothing to do with cell
phone use.

you find no compulsion to even *look* for those accidents
that your argument predicts.

You are projecting again. It is *you* who clearly refuses to look for
accidents that are in plain sight.

If not, then you really can't be reasoned with.

Projection, again.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR