View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Mike Humphrey Mike Humphrey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 116
Default Purpose of shower isolation switch

Graham. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 23:29:35 -0000, "Tough Guy no. 1265"
wrote:

Had a look around on t'internet, seems to be no real reason to have a shower cord in the bathroom. Why does it need to be switched off any more than any other appliance? Apart from maintainence once a decade, in which case you pull the fuse in the fusebox.


Doesn't have to be a pullcord, can be a dolly switch outside the
bathroom.
I don't trust pullcord switches, even if they have a mechanical
tell-tail, so I would always isolate upstream as well.


Every appliance needs an isolator, and an isolator must isolate all live
conductors - that is both line and neutral. It also needs to be either
near enough the appliance that someone working on the appliance can see
(and stop!) somone going to turn it back on, or it needs a lock. So the
fuse in the main fusebox doesn't count - it's single pole and out of
sight (in practice with a fuse you can pull the fuse and put it in
your pocket, but it's still single pole and technically not an
isolator).

For most appliances, they have a plug. Unplugging meets all the
requirements for isolation. Appliances that don't have an accessible
plug need an isolator switch. That's usually a rocker switch in an
appropriate rating mounted next to the appliance. These aren't allowed
in a bathroom, though, so you have three choices:
a) A pull-cord isolator in the bathroom
b) A rocker switch isolator outside the bathroom, but still within sight
of someone working on the shower.
c) An isolator outside the bathroom that can be locked out.

The default choice seems to be a, though I would argue b is better if
possible.

Mike