On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 17:38:31 UTC, John Rumm wrote:
On 03/11/2015 20:42, Capitol wrote:

I missed that one, but the 60 degree cycle time of 205 minutes
is totally unacceptable.

longer cycle times tend to come with lower water usage... The
requirements for lower water usage are driven by EU legislation that
requires certain minimum "washing efficiencies". They are defined in
this document:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-conte...0R1015&from=EN

It's also too big to fit the space. IMO the

What size of machine are you looking for then? That one seems to be a
standard size.

spin speed is also too high for reliability.

Can't really see why, however they let you choose your spin speed
normally, so use a slower one if you think it will help.

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

There are two aspect to washing.
One is the detergents, the other is the mechanical action.
Machine that useless water, use more mechanical action.
This however wears out the laundry.
Most wear & tear on clothing etc arises through laundering.

Any machine with no heater will never work well as it cannot achieve optimum temperatures to do the job