"charles" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Capitol wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In ,
Tough Guy no. wrote:

They obviously have to control parking in some way, as it's beside
an extremely busy station, with no car park.


Then the station should build themselves a car park. Why did the
council approve a station with no car park?

It was built before cars were invented. Next point?


Why haven't they built a car park?

Why would you want a car park at a train station? If you have a car, why
not use it for the whole journey?

'cos there's nowhere to park at the other end. And, if you work in London,
the train gets you there quite a bit faster.


I can do Ruislip Manor to Oxford Street faster in my van than on the tube if
I avoid rush hours. There is always somewhere to park, but it costs.

--
Adam