"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Capitol wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In ,
Tough Guy no. wrote:

They obviously have to control parking in some way, as it's beside an
extremely busy station, with no car park.


Then the station should build themselves a car park. Why did the
council approve a station with no car park?

It was built before cars were invented. Next point?


Why haven't they built a car park?

Why would you want a car park at a train station?
If you have a car, why not use it for the whole journey?

Because the train is a lot better value in some situations.