On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 7:40:57 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:07:57 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster
wrote:

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 1:09:39 PM UTC-5, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:22:08 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:02:49 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 2:54:31 PM UTC-4, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:43:14 -0700, T wrote:

Boehner resigned! YIPPEE !!!!!!!


Where is the bad?! We don't need RINO's.

Probably should wait to find out who's going to replace him
before T starts celebrating. Whoever it is, I hope it's someone
who will keep the few extremists under control who want to shut
down the govt again, over Planned Parenthood this time.

Congress, by the Constitution in meant to be in grid-lock. It was
designed that way. Checks and balances. America is better off. I'm
tired of a politician saying what they "will do", gets elected and not
fill the promises made. Take Trump for example -- promises, promises
-- no substance in his rhetoric.

I'd rather hear honesty. Elect me and I won't do **** for you!

What you want to hear and what the vast majority of the other voters
want to hear are two different things. No one will ever be elected on
the platform of "I'll do nothing".

Ben Carson took an oath to do no harm. He'd make a good President. ^_^



Yeah, if you want a president with such a poor grasp of science that
he thinks evolution isn't real. Or because men who go into prison and
get forced into homosexual acts it means they have chosen to be
homosexuals and that proves homosexuality is a choice. He has ONE
skill, surgical skill, that's it.

Of course Trump says that he's going to round up 11 mil illegals, deport
them all, at a cost of $120 bil, then he will "expedite" their legal
return back here. That has a lot more relevance in the election
than what a candidate believes in evolution. Besides, weren't you the
guy saying it's all just bluster, nothing matters, etc? Why is Carson's
opinion of how someone becomes homosexual probative to the election,
while Trump's flip-flops among party, immigration positions, etc is irrelevant?
Sounds like very selective and irrational application of rules.