Thread: #loadshedding
View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
bert[_5_] bert[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,290
Default #loadshedding

In article , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes
In article ,
Tim Watts wrote:
On 10/09/15 10:37, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Wonderful! I love the plot line where a man holds a gun to your head
and tells you to rob a bank or else, and then claims it was all your
own doing, for selfish reasons of self preservation!

Fighting for better pay or conditions of service is holding a 'gun to
your head'. Or, of course the more usual 'holding the country to
ransom'. But then hyperbole does tend to be a tool of the extreme
right wing.


It's another case of what happens when power is highly imbalanced. In
this case, it rested (unusually) with the state workforce across many
industries.


In which case they'd have been by far the highest paid workers in the
land. At the time of the 3 day week there was the usual pay freeze or
whatever in the public sector - while prices continued to escalate.
Difference today is that with the same sort of freeze on public sector
pay, there isn't the same price inflation.

I don't blame them for taking what they could at the time - but in the
long term it gave enough impetus to the government to produce a lot of
union restricting legislature. About the only industry with any worker
power left is the trains now.


Well quite. The majority (or rather those who could be bothered to vote)
were conned into thinking unions were the problem. Not bothered about the
underlying reasons for dreadful industrial relations. And of course those
industries with dreadful industrial relations went under at the same sort
of time as Thatcher's union legislation came in.

Did you actually live through that period?

Of course it's far better now. Loads of the poorest on zero hours
contracts at minimum wage. Just what big business ordered.


Which is a bloody disgrace.


There is a vast difference between Casual Labour and Zero Hours
contracts - principally where the latter seeks to "own" the employee
exclusively, but merely pay them for the hours it feels like.


I would love to see that tested in court, if an employee held 2 or more
zero hour contracts simultaneously and was subsequently fired because of it.


Part of the problem now is not that the unions are powerless, but that
most people are too apathetic to join one. What usually happens is the
good people bugger off to a better employer and the weaker (but not
necessarily useless) ones get left holding the ****ty end of the stick.


And of course the large number of young immigrants desperate for work of
any sort is just what big business wants.

Well it was Labour who opened the door to these large number of
immigrants.
--
bert