dadiOH wrote:
Muggles wrote:

I don't understand the outrage about him hunting a lion? The story I
saw said he paid guides to set up the opportunity to hunt the animal.
Shouldn't the guides be the ones in trouble? Maybe I haven't seen the
whole story.

Ask yourself, why would anyone even WANT to shoot a lion? And with an arrow
yet, said arrow requiring the lion to suffer for 40 hours until the mighty
hunter and his money grubbing guides managed to find and finally kill it.

IMO, the answer to my rhetorical question is either that he gets his jollies
killing things and/orhe is trying to show the world he actually has cojones.

Just remember the $50,000 he reputedly paid for his "adventure" the next
time you lay out $100 or so for 45 minutes of a dental assistant's time. Or
the $3000 - $6000 for 25-30 or so half hour visits by your kid to have
straight teeth.

This guy is unethical. Tarring all good hunters.
Luring animal to shoot is illegal to begin with. That is cowardice.
Only god knows what was state of his logic shooting that lion. He says
he took him, not shot him or killed him. Gung Ho, childish act to show
off. Wonder he was ever in the service and served in a war zone.