On 06/22/2015 11:01 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote:
On 22/06/2015 13:41, JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2015-06-22, Darklight wrote:
Snit wrote:

On 6/21/15, 2:27 PM, in article
, "Tomas"
wrote:

[deletia]

I do know that some major banks use linux to run their servers HSBC being
one of them. Productive enough for you.

if you knew any thing. What you put in is what you get out.
With windows you pay cash. with linux you pay time. No

No, not really. That's an outdated bit of snark that wasn't even true when
it was first stated even.

WinDOS is simply a mess. It's alway has been. It's always lagged behind on
usability features and always managed to mess them up somehow. Then there are

Yup such a mess and so lagging behind it's been the number one choice
for desktop computing for years :-)

the robustness issues. Microsoft pretty much innovated the email virus. They

What robustness issues? When was the last time you saw an ATM not
working? When was the last time your bank clerk couldn't work becasue
their Windows PC was down?


ATMs are robust?

--
Caver1

It makes sense, when you don't think about it.