View Single Post
  #41   Report Post  
Posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.os.linux.ubuntu,alt.home.repair
Chris Ahlstrom[_2_] Chris Ahlstrom[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default A Perfect Case For NOT Using Linux.

rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On 06/21/2015 05:57 PM, Snit wrote:
OK, so it is a good techie playground... a good place to learn about
computers and offers great command line shells. That and it can be had at no
cost and, like OS X, the risk of malware is far lower than on Windows.

Anything where it handles tasks better: things where you can show it
benefitting productivity, efficiency, or error-reduction?


you've just answered your own question. We develop on Linux and port the
product to Windows. Why? The development tools on Linux, such as gdb,
valgrind, electric fence, and so forth are superior to what is available
on Windows and are no cost.


+1

The rest of your post was cool, too, but I snipped it for brevity.

--
At least for the people who send me mail about a new language that they're
designing, the general advice is: do it to learn about how to write a
compiler. Don't have any expectations that anyone will use it, unless you hook
up with some sort of organization in a position to push it hard. It's a
lottery, and some can buy a lot of the tickets. There are plenty of beautiful
languages (more beautiful than C) that didn't catch on. But someone does win
the lottery, and doing a language at least teaches you something.
-- Dennis Ritchie (1941-2011), creator of the C programming language and of
UNIX