On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:43:58 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote:

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:22:18 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

Banquer is once again at a loss for words!

#4 collection of selected hilarity from your court case, where you
idiotically tried to place the blame for your own failure on some poor
female.

According to 'da judge:

.... The plaintiff Jonathan Banquer ...

....Nor can the court credit the evidence offered by the plaintiff as
to the value of the goods lost. The court does not believe that all of
the money given to the plaintiff by his parents was given to him
between August and November of 1993 nor that all of that money went to
buy CT Page 13671 tools. That the plaintiff testified that the value
of the tools was twice what he paid, that he paid for them all in cash
(when there is evidence that he was using a credit card for many other
purchases during the same time), that he offered no names of the
vendors nor lists or photos of the types of tools, all of these
factors make the plaintiff's testimony not credible as to the value of
the lost items. In the absence of credible evidence of the value of
the lost items, the court would be left to speculate or guess as to
their value, a process that is not allowed....

You thought you could hornswoggle the judge into agreeing that your
crap was worth twice what you paid in cash, and without any list,
receipts, photos or details. Where the hell did you find a lawyer
willing to go along with any of this bull****? I hope he insisted on
being paid in advance.