On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 3:50:20 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 1:59:33 PM UTC-5, trader_4 wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 10:39:44 AM UTC-5, trader_4 wrote:

K, let's talk. Did anyone in the Bush administration have their
own private email server in their own house? Any of them use private
email for govt business exclusively?

That's too stupid to respond...since when does email equate with transparency?

Apparently it equates in your world, for one. YOU brought up the issue
of transparency of the previous administration in this thread about email.
And apparently it equates in most of the rest of the world, including
most of your fellow libs. The laws and rules regarding govt email preservation
were instituted to ensure that there is a record of who did what,
retained by the govt, so that the American people, historians, prosecutors,
etc can see them. It's a similar concept to FOIA. It would be hard to get
honest govt info if any govt employee can keep and control whatever they
want. Capiche?

It was Mr. Combs that brought up transparency in this tread...get your **** straight.

Ok, so he brought it up in the context of the emails. And then you
extended it to questioning the transparency of the Bush administration.
And then you're posting some nonsense about it not being relevant
to emails.

What kind of job do you have to offer the volume of "endowed words" on us that you frequent here? Are you a government worker...on the internet all the time, and not doing your job?
Personally, I'm retired, and not here as much as you.

But here you are, again, aren't you?